期刊文献+

肾移植术后分别应用麦考酚钠和吗替麦考酚酯两种免疫抑制方案的比较 被引量:3

Comparison between the two immunosuppressive regimens after renal transplantation:enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium versus mycophenolate mofetil
原文传递
导出
摘要 【目的】探讨肾移植受者使用麦考酚钠肠溶片三联免疫抑制治疗的有效性和安全性。【方法】选取2009年10月至2014年1月在本院接受尸体肾移植的受者60例,并随机分为麦考酚钠组(30例)和吗替麦考酚酯组(30例),两组肾移植受者术后分别应用他克莫司+麦考酚钠+泼尼松三联免疫抑制方案(麦考酚钠组)和他克莫司+吗替麦考酚酯+泼尼松(吗替麦考酚酯组)三联免疫抑制方案,术后随访观察,应用统计学方法比较两组受者术后人/肾存活率,急性排斥反应发生率,移植肾功能恢复情况及药物不良反应(感染、腹泻、肝功异常、高血压、高血糖等)的发生情况。【结果】所有受者随访12~63个月,两组人/肾存活率均为100%。两组术后早期各有2例出现急性排斥反应,应用甲泼尼龙(methylprednisolone,MP)或MP+抗人T淋巴细胞兔免疫球蛋白冲击后逆转,无移植物丢失。麦考酚钠组中出现移植肾功能恢复延迟2例,吗替麦考酚酯组中出现移植肾功能恢复延迟3例,均未调整免疫抑制方案,规律血液透析,每2~3 d透析1次,术后恢复泌尿时间为7~29 d,伴随尿量增加,肾功逐渐恢复。至随访终点,麦考酚钠组30例受者移植肾功能良好,血肌酐(serum creatinine,SCr)为(92.6±12.7)μmol/L,吗替麦考酚酯组中有1例出现移植肾功能不全,SCr 190μmol/L,发展为慢性移植肾肾病,其余29例受者移植肾功能良好,SCr为(90.6±13.5)μmol/L,上述差异均无明显统计学意义(P〉0.05)。两组药物不良反应观察结果显示,两组在肺部感染、肝功损害、高血压、高血糖发生率方面均无明显统计学差异,但麦考酚钠组的腹泻发生率较吗替麦考酚酯组明显降低[(1.5±0.8)次/d vs(3.5±1.6)次/d;P〈0.05]。【结论】麦考酚钠与他克莫司、泼尼松联合应用于肾移植受者,在提高人/肾存活率、抑制急性排斥反应发生、移植肾功能恢� [Objective]To explore the efficacy and safety of the triple immunosuppressive therapy based on enteric-coated mycopheno- late sodium (EC-MPS). [ Methods ] From Oct 2009 to Jan 2014, 60 recipients received cadaveric kidney transplantation in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into two groups: EC-MPS group (30 cases) and mycophenolate mofetil(MMF) group (30 cases). Re- cipients in EC-MPS group were treated with EC-MPS, tacrolimus (FK-506) and prednisone (Pred). Recipients in MMF group were treated with MMF, FK-506 and Pred. Recipient/graft survival rate and acute rejection incidence were compared between the two groups. The graft function and adverse drug reactions (such as infection, diarrhea, abnormal liver function, hypertension and hyperglycemia) were observed and statistically analyzed. [ Results ] All recipients were followed up for 12-63 months. The recipient/graft survival rates of the two groups were all 100%. However, there were two cases with acute rejection in each group. No graft loss occurred after the use of methylprednisolone (MP) or anti-human T lymphocyte rabbit immu- noglobulin(ATG). Two cases with graft function recovery delay occurred in EC-MPS group and three cases in MMF group. For the five cases, immunosuppressive regimens were not changed. They gradually recovered their renal functions after receiving hemodialysis every 2- 3 days. After 7-29 days, postoperative emiction occurred, following urine output increase and renal function recovery. Till the end of follow- up, all 30 cases had good graft functions in EC-MPS group with the average serum creatinine (SCr) (92.6 ± 12.7) μmol/L. One case in MMF group developed into chronic allograft nephropathy with SCr 190 μmol/L and the other 29 cases had good graft function with the average SCr (90.6 ± 13.5) μmol/L. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups (P〉0.05). As for adverse drug reac- tions, there was no statistically significant differen
出处 《武警后勤学院学报(医学版)》 CAS 2015年第6期434-437,共4页 Journal of Logistics University of PAP(Medical Sciences)
关键词 肾移植 麦考酚钠 吗替麦考酚酯 急性排斥反应 腹泻 Renal transplantation Mycophenolate sodium Mycophenolate mofetil Acute rejection Diarrhea
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Salvadori M, Benoni E, Budde K, et al. Superior efficacy of enteric-coated mycophenolate VS mycophenolate mofetil in de novo transplant recipients:pooled analysis[J]. Transplant Proc, 2010, 42(4):1325-1328. 被引量:1
  • 2Sollinger HW, Sundberg AK, Leverson G, et al. Mycopheno- late mofetil versus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium: a large, single-center comparison of dose adjustments and out- comes in kedney transplant recipients[J]. Transplantation, 2010, 89(4):446-451. 被引量:1
  • 3Frei P, Weber A, Geier A, eta/. Lessons from a transplant pa- tient with diarrhea, cryptosporidial infection, and possible mycophenolate mofefil-associated colitis[J]. Transpl Infect Dis, 2011, 13(4):416-418. 被引量:1
  • 4Womard JB, Rerolle JV, Picard N, et aL Risk of diarrhea in a long-term cohort of renal transplant patients given mycophe- nolate mofetihthe significant role of the UGT1A8 2 variant allele[J]. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2010, 69(6):675"683. 被引量:1
  • 5祁洪刚,翁国斌,任雨,黄建军,高文波,张曙伟,姜继光,姚许平.肾移植术后1年以上合并慢性腹泻转换麦考酚钠肠溶片治疗的临床观察[J].现代实用医学,2012,24(3):302-303. 被引量:4
  • 6Gozdowska J, Urbanowicz A, Baczkowska T, et al. Safety and tolerance of sodium mycophenolate in patients after renal transplantation-an observational study[J]. Transplant Proc, 2009, 41(8):3016-3018. 被引量:1
  • 7周华,孙平平,贾志缃,孙永康,李宁,武小桐.麦考酚钠肠溶片在肾移植受者初始免疫抑制治疗的观察[J].中国药物与临床,2012,12(7):935-936. 被引量:2
  • 8Bolin P, Tanriover B, Zibari GB, et al. Improvement in 3- month patient-reported gastrointestinal symptoms after con- version from mycophenolate mofetil to entericcoated myeo- phenolate sodium in renal transplant patients[J]. Transplan- tation, 2007, 84(11): 1443-1451. 被引量:1
  • 9Rupprecht K, Schmidt C, Rasp6 A, et al. Bioavailability of myeophenolate mofetil and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium is differentially affected by pantoprazole in healthy volunteers[J]. J Clin Pharmacol, 2009, 49(10): 1196-1201. 被引量:1
  • 10许亮,蔡明,金海龙,王强,许晓光,石炳毅.麦考酚钠肠溶片与吗替麦考酚酯胶囊联合质子泵抑制剂对肾移植患者酶酚酸暴露的影响[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2011,15(53):9901-9904. 被引量:3

二级参考文献37

  • 1李永翔,谭建明,范煜,沈兵,陈向锋,陈晓波,孙星.免疫抑制剂致肾移植患者十二指肠溃疡穿孔(附1例报告并文献复习)[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2005,20(10):595-596. 被引量:4
  • 2Sollinger HW, Sundberg AK, Leverson G, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil versus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium: a large, single-center comparison of dose adjustments and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients [J]. Transplantation,.2010, 89(4): 446-451. 被引量:1
  • 3Sellin JH. The pathophysiology of diarrhea[J]. Clin Transplant,2001,15(4): 2-10. 被引量:1
  • 4Frei P, Weber A, Geier A, et al. Lessons from a transplant patient with diarrhea, cryptosporidial infection, and possible mycophenolate mofetil-associated colitis[J]. Transpl Infect Dis, 2011,13(4): 416-418. 被引量:1
  • 5Arslan H, Inci EK, Azap OK, et al. Etiologic agents of diarrhea in solid organ recipients[J]. Transpl Infect Dis, 2007, 9(4): 270-275. 被引量:1
  • 6Woillard JB, Rerolle JP, Picard N, et al. Risk of diarrhoea in a long-term cohort of renal transplant patients given mycophenolate mofetil: the significant role of the UGT1A8 2 variant allele[J]. Br J Clin Pharmaeol, 2010, 69(6): 675-683. 被引量:1
  • 7Gozdowska J, Urbanowicz A, Baczkowska T, et al. Safety and tolerance of sodium mycophenolate in patients after renal transplantation--an observational study[J]. Transplant Proc, 2009, 41 (8): 3016-3018. 被引量:1
  • 8Salvadori M, Bertoni E, Budde K, et al. Superior efficacy of enteric-coated mycophenolate vs mycophenolate mofetil in de novo transplant recipients: pooled analysis[J]. Transplant Proc, 2010, 42(4): 1325-1328. 被引量:1
  • 9Kelly P,Kahan BD.Review:metabolism of immunosuppressant drugs.Curr Drug Metab.2002;3(3):275-287. 被引量:1
  • 10Sarkio S,Halme L,Kyll?nen L,et al.Severe gastrointestinal complications after1,515adult kidney transplantations.Transpl Int.2004;17(9):505-510. 被引量:1

共引文献6

同被引文献45

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部