期刊文献+

麦考酚钠肠溶片与吗替麦考酚酯用于肾移植术后有效性与安全性的Meta分析 被引量:3

Efficacy and Safety of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的系统评价麦考酚钠肠溶片(EC-MPS)与吗替麦考酚酯(MMF)用于肾移植术后的疗效和安全性。方法计算机检索MEDLINE、EMbase、Pub Med、The Cochrane Library(2013年第9期)、CBM、CNKI、VIP和Wan Fang Data数据库,并追溯纳入研究的参考文献,搜集肾移植术后采用EC-MPS与MMF比较进行免疫抑制治疗的随机对照试验(RCT),检索时限为建库至2013年9月。由两位研究者按纳入与排除标准独立筛选文献、提取资料和评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用Rev Man 5.1软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入8个RCT,包括2 400例肾移植术后患者。Meta分析结果显示:在不同的随访时间点,EC-MPS组与MMF组的急性排斥反应发生率[4周:RR=0.33,95%CI(0.01,8.05);6个月:RR=0.94,95%CI(0.73,1.22);12个月:RR=0.88,95%CI(0.63,1.24);48个月:RR=0.93,95%CI(0.47,1.84)]、慢性排斥反应发生率[6个月:RR=0.66,95%CI(0.27,1.58);12月:RR=0.57,95%CI(0.29,1.15)]和移植物失功/丢失率[6个月:RR=0.79,95%CI(0.41,1.50);12个月:RR=0.76,95%CI(0.40,1.43);48个月:RR=1.38,95%CI(0.59,3.23)]差异均无统计学意义。在不良反应发生率方面,EC-MPS组除肺炎发生率低于MMF组[RR=0.32;95%CI(0.13,0.79)]外,其余不良反应发生率在两组间差异均无统计学意义。结论当前证据表明,肾移植术后EC-MPS与MMF相比,近期疗效相似,EC-MPS组的肺炎发生率低于MMF组。受纳入研究数量和质量所限,上述结论尚需开展更多高质量研究来验证。 Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium(EC-MPS) versus mycophenolate mofetil(MMF) in kidney transplant recipients. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMbase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library(Issue 9, 2013), CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data from their inception to November 2013, to collect randomized controlled trials(RCTs) of EC-MPS versus MMF in kidney transplant recipients. References of included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened studies according to the exclusion and inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using Rev Man 5.1 software. Results A total of 8 RCTs involving 2 400 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between the two groups at the end of 4-week, 6-month, 12-month and 48-month follow-up in the acute rejection rate(4-weeks: RR=0.33, 95%CI 0.01 to 8.05; 6 months: RR=0.94, 95%CI 0.73 to 1.22; 12 months: RR=0.88, 95%CI 0.63 to 1.24; 4 years: RR=0.93, 95%CI 0.47 to 1.84). There were no significant differences between the two groups at the end of 6-month and 12-month follow-up in the chronic rejection rate(6 month: RR=0.66, 95%CI 0.27 to 1.58; 12 month: RR=0.57, 95%CI 0.29 to 1.15). There were no significant differences between the two groups at the end of 6-month, 12-month and 48-month follow-up in the graft loss or death rate(6-month: RR=0.79, 95%CI 0.41 to 1.50; 12-month: RR=0.76, 95%CI 0.40 to 1.43; 48-month: RR=1.38, 95%CI 0.59 to 3.23). As to the side effect, EC-MPS could significantly reduce the risk of pneumonia compared with MMF(RR=0.32, 95%CI 0.13 to 0.79). Conclusion Based on current evidences, EC-MPS is comparable with MMF for renal transplant patients in short-term effectiveness, and the incidence of pneumonia in the EC-MPS group is lower than the MMF group. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the studies, the c
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2015年第6期681-686,共6页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 “十二五”国家科技支撑计划课题“安全合理用药评价和干预技术研究与应用”(编号:2013BAI06B04)
关键词 吗替麦考酚酯 麦考酚钠肠溶片 肾移植 免疫抑制 META分析 系统评价 随机对照试验 Mycophenolate mofetil Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) Renal transplantation Immunosuppression Meta-analysis Randomized controlled trial
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Higgins JP,Greens.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention (Version 5.1.0).Available at:http://www.cochrane-handbook.org. 被引量:1
  • 2Budde K,Curtis J,Knoll G,et al.Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium can be safely administered in maintenance renal transplant patients:results of a 1-year study.Am J Transplant,2004,4 (2):237-243. 被引量:1
  • 3Ciancio G,Gaynor JJ,Zarak A,et al.Randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in primary renal transplantation with tacrolimus and steroid avoidance:four-year analysis.Transplantation,2011,91(11):1198-1205. 被引量:1
  • 4Ciancio G,Burke GW,Gaynor JJ,et al.Randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in primary renal transplant recipients given tacrolimus and daclizumab/thymoglobulin:One year follow-up.Transplantation,2008,86 (1):67-74. 被引量:1
  • 5Ortega F,Sanchez-Fructuoso A,Cruzado JM,et al.Gastrointestinal quality of life improvement of renal transplant recipients converted from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium drugs or agents:mycophenolate mofetil and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium.Transplantation,2011,92 (4):426-432. 被引量:1
  • 6Langone AJ,Chan L,Bolin P,et al.Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium versus mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients experiencing gastrointestinal intolerance:a multicenter,double-blind,randomized study.Transplantation,2011,91(4):470-478. 被引量:1
  • 7Salvadori M,Holzer H,de Mattos A,et al.Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium is therapeutically equivalent to mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients.Am J Transplantation,2004,4 (2):231-236. 被引量:1
  • 8Granger DK.Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium:results of two pivotal global multicenter trials.Transplantation Proc,2001,33 (7-8):3241-3244. 被引量:1
  • 9Salvadori M.Therapeutic equivalence of mycophenolate sodium versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant recipients.Transplantation Proc,2001,33 (7-8):3245-3247. 被引量:1
  • 10Cooper M,Deering KL,Slakey DP,et al.Comparing outcomes associated with dose manipulations of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium versus mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients.Transplantation,2009,88 (4):514-520. 被引量:1

二级参考文献2

共引文献2

同被引文献23

  • 1王海燕.肾脏病学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:8262. 被引量:481
  • 2国家药品不良反应监测中心.常见严重药品不良反应技术规范及评价标准[S], 2011 -03 -29. 被引量:2
  • 3KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney trans- plant recipients[J]. Am J Transplant,2009, 9(Suppl 3): s1- s157. 被引量:1
  • 4Staatz CE, Tett SE. Clinical pharrnacokinetics and pharmaeo- dynamics of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients [J]. Clin Pharmacokinet,2007,46(1):13-58. 被引量:1
  • 5Land W, Vincenti F. Toxicity-sparing protocols using myco- phenolate mofetil in renal transplantation [ J]. Transplanta- tion, 2005,80 (2 Suppl) s221-s234. 被引量:1
  • 6Le Meura Y, Biiehlerb M, Thierryc A, et al. Individualized Mycophenolate Mofetil dosing based on drug exposure signifi- cantly improves patient outcomes after renal transplantation [J]. Am J Transplant, 2007,7,2496-2503. 被引量:1
  • 7Gastona RS, Kaplanb B, Shahc T,et al. Fixed or controlled- dose mycophenolate mofetil with standard- or reduced-dose cal- cineurin inhibitors: the opticept trial [J]. Am J Transplant, 2009,9:1607-1619. 被引量:1
  • 8洪秀娟,周长林,顾觉奋.麦考酚酸酯及其临床应用进展[J].药学与临床研究,2009,17(3):227-230. 被引量:7
  • 9田普训,薛武军,丁小明,潘晓鸣,燕航,冯新顺,侯军,项和立,田晓辉.肾移植后不同免疫抑制方案的效果及不良反应的临床分析[J].中华器官移植杂志,2011,32(4):201-204. 被引量:6
  • 10韩澍,郑鳕洋,王立明,周梅生,曾力,张雷,傅尚希,朱有华.肾移植后因免疫抑制剂的不良反应转换应用咪唑立宾的效果[J].中华器官移植杂志,2011,32(4):209-212. 被引量:5

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部