摘要
巨额财产来源不明罪的行为本质在理论上存在多种不同的观点,这也造成司法实践中"同案不同判"的现象。通过对本罪法益的剖析,以及对"不能说明财产来源"的重新定位。得出结论:巨额财产来源不明罪的法益为公众对国家工作人员职务行为廉洁性的信赖,"能够说明财产来源"定位为本罪的出罪事由,本罪的行为本质是持有;理论上"不作为论"的观点与不作为犯的基本原理不符;"立法推定型"的观点违背了犯罪的本质。
There are debates on the essence of the objective implementation behavior in the crime of holding a huge amount of property with unidentified sources around ＂Holding theory＂ and ＂Omission theory＂. Different understanding of the nature of this crime results in codefendant different sentence in judicial practice, which is the source of the writing. Based on the discussion of legal interest of this crime, component and judicial practice the authors conclude that ＂Hold theory＂ is more appropriate than ＂Omission theory＂ for the objective implementation behavior of this crime..
出处
《天津法学》
2015年第2期23-28,共6页
Tianjin Legal Science
关键词
巨额财产来源不明罪
行为本质
持有论
legal interest
essence of action
burden of proof
crime of holding a huge amount of property with unidentified sources
