摘要
在我国,动产能否设置用益物权一直是学界争论的议题。这主要因为我国物权体系学习大陆法系,而东西方大陆法系国家对动产用益物权采取了两种截然不同的立法态度,东亚国家普遍不予设置。这也是我国持废弃观点学者的一大理由。我国2007年《物权法》第117条承认了动产的客体地位,但并未确立完善的动产用益物权制度。随着经济的发展,对物利用需求的深化,市场主体开始自觉不自觉地运用动产用益物权的原理来解决资源紧缺和交易安全的问题。确立完善的动产用益物权制度的条件日渐成熟。
In our country, whether the chattel could be set usufructuary right is always a question. This is mainly because our property system is learned from the continental legal system. And the attitudes of legislation of continental legal system countries in east and west are completely different. The countries in east Asian don’t set it. That is why some of our scholars fight against it. After the real rights law of people’s republic of China promulgated, the status of the chattel usufruct is admitted, but the perfect system of the right has not been established. With the economic development, the demand for substance use deeply, and the market players‘practice in solving the questions of resource constraints and transaction security, the voice of opposition is lower and lower. The conditions to establish a perfect institution of the usufructuary right of chattel are gradually mature.
出处
《安徽警官职业学院学报》
2015年第1期40-45,共6页
Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
关键词
物权
用益物权
动产
公示制度
property rights
usufructuary right
chattel
institutions of demonstration
