摘要
司法公开根据动力来源的区别可以分为内生型和外发型两种模式。尽管当前全国法院正在全面推进司法公开,但主要是作为回应社会需求的工具性政策考量,而忽视了其本位价值,导致其目标取向、制度构建、工作推进等方面出现偏离。为此,一方面要厘清司法公开与司法公正的定位,促进司法公开的本质回归;另一方面,在制定落实司法公开政策时,要注重兼顾理性建构与经验推动,努力实现供需平衡。
According to the power source, judicial openness can be divided into two types, the endogenous model and the exog- enous model. In China, the people＇s courts at all level are promoting the judicial openness, but they mainly function as a response to the social demand, and ignore the standard value. Thus, the goal, mechanism and implementation of judicial openness seem to be off the beam. Therefore, on the one hand, it is necessary to clarify the position of the judicial openness and the justice, so as to promote the essence regression of judicial openness. On the other hand, when making and implementing the policy of judicial openness, we should pay attention to beth the rational construction and the practical experience in order to balance the supply and demand.
出处
《内蒙古大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2015年第2期106-112,共7页
Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
司法公开
内生型
外发型
本质回归
供需平衡
Judicial openness
endogenous model
exogenous model
essence regression
equilibrium of supply and de-mand
