摘要
《隋志》对小说家的理解源于《汉志》,其在子部小说家《燕丹子》附注提到的《宋玉子》,不应该是在集部著录的《宋玉集》,而是一部在唐初已经亡佚的小说集。宋玉既是著名辞赋家,也是有代表性的小说家,他的赋家和言语侍从之臣的身份与利用俳谐言语娱乐君王的俳优颇为接近。俳优小说是中国古代小说的重要一支,而谐隐、俗赋是俳优小说的主要表现形式。《隋志》编者对宋玉的重视以及对小说的理解,使其对已经亡佚的小说集《宋玉子》给予了特别关注,其所确定的宋玉的小说家地位值得我们重视。
Songyuzi was mentioned in the notes of the philosophy section Yandanzi in Suizhi（Annals of the Sui Dynasty）,which illustrated the understanding of novolists according to Hanzhi（Han Dynasty·Yiwen Records）.However,Songyuzi should not be Songyu Collection which was recorded in Miscellaneous Works,but a collection of novels which had been lost in early Tang Dynasty.Songyu was not only a noted Cifu writer,but also a representative novelist,whose status as a Fu writer and a speech attendant was rather close to clowns who amused kings with comic language.Clown stories,with the main expression forms of implicit humor and vulgar fu,were an important branch of ancient Chinese novels.Owing to the appreciation and understanding of Songyu,the editor of Suizhi,who established Songyu as a novelist,paid special attention to Songyuzi,a novel collection which had already been lost,which deserves our attention.
出处
《齐鲁学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第1期117-122,共6页
Qilu Journal
