摘要
最高人民法院在奇虎诉腾讯滥用市场支配地位纠纷终审判决中对相关市场界定、市场支配地位认定及二者的关系问题进行了精辟的论述。我们将从该案二审亲历者的角度出发,结合国内外相关判例,对该判决中关于相关市场界定中的责任分配、假定垄断者测试在相关市场界定中的地位、替代性分析应遵循的多数且重要原则,以及从动态竞争的角度正确看待市场份额在市场支配地位认定中的作用、市场支配地位认定的综合分析方法等进行详细的解读和必要的归纳。最高人民法院的前述审理思路和认定结论无疑将对后续的反垄断诉讼、行政调查及企业的合规必然产生深远的影响。
In the final judgment for the appellate case Qihoo 360 v. Tencent, the Supreme Court of China delivered insightful explanation over the core issues, among other things, the definition of 'relevant market', the establishment of dominant market position as well as the relationship between the two factors. From the perspective of frontline witnesses and in comparison with corresponsive cases in other jurisdictions, we have explored and summarized a number of critical points in this case, such as the onus of proof and the position of Hypothetical Monopolist Test(HMT, also known as 'SSNIP') in defining 'relevant market', the 'principle of majority and significance' in interchangeability analysis, as well as for purpose of determining market dominant position, the indicative value of market share in a dynamic competition context and the comprehensive analytical approach. Both the reasoning and conclusion adopted by the Supreme Court of China would certainly have profound impact upon subsequent anti-monopoly litigations, administrative investigations as well as corporate compliance programs.
出处
《科技与法律》
2015年第1期190-209,共20页
Science Technology and Law
关键词
相关市场界定
假定垄断者测试
多数且重要原则
市场份额
Definition of 'Relevant Market'
Hypothetical Monopolist Test(HMT)
Principle of Majority and Significance
Market Share
