期刊文献+

论滥用市场支配地位行为的法律规制——兼评“腾讯与奇虎360”案 被引量:14

On the Regulation of Misusing the Market Dominant Position Behaviors:A Commentary on "Tencent v. Odd Tiger 360" Suit
下载PDF
导出
摘要 滥用市场支配地位指享有市场支配地位的企业出于排斥竞争或者控制市场的目的,依赖自己的市场优势地位对相关市场的其他竞争者或者交易对手进行不公平交易的行为。滥用市场支配地位行为的认定应当从形成市场支配地位与滥用市场支配地位两个方面进行。腾讯公司强制性要求软件用户在360产品和QQ之间进行选择,其行为本身是一种限定用户交易行为的法律性质,即违反了我国《反垄断法》的相关规定而构成滥用市场支配地位。对滥用市场支配地位的行为进行规制需要从完善现行立法与加强行业自律等两大方面同时进行。 Misusing the market dominant position behavior is defined that the company which has the market dominant position commits unfair transactions with its competitor or its client to exclude competition or to control the market.Establishing the identity of the misusing the market dominant position behavior depends on its status and relative misuse behaviors.The Tencent forced customers to choose one software product between Odd Tiger 360 and Tencent,which restricts its customer's consuming behavior.That's to say,it violates the relative articles of antitrust law and actually forms the misusing the market dominant position behavior.To regulate the misusing behaviors,the laws and the industry self-discipline should be improved simultaneously.
出处 《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第2期57-61,共5页 Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目:个人信息的网络侵权问题研究(09CFX049)
关键词 市场支配地位 滥用市场支配地位 法律规制 the market dominant position misusing the market dominant position behavior regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献23

  • 1王磊.试论对滥用市场支配地位行为的法律制裁方式[J].学术交流,2005(6):29-32. 被引量:1
  • 2Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v.United States.221 U.S.1(1911). 被引量:1
  • 3United States v.AT&T,552 F.Supp.131.218 n.362(DDC 1982). 被引量:1
  • 4Corwin D.Edwards,The Price Discrimination Law:A Review of Experience(Washington,DC:The Brookings Institution,1959),P.661 ff. 被引量:1
  • 5[美国]查里斯·R·吉斯特,傅浩,钱钢,郭学堂,杨海燕,安萍萍译.《美国垄断史—帝国的缔造者和他们的敌人(从杰伊古尔德到比尔盖茨)》.北京:经济科学出版社,2004年版,第118页. 被引量:1
  • 6Aspen Skiing Company v.Aspen Highlands Skiing Corporation 472 U.S.585(1985). 被引量:1
  • 7United States v.Aluminium Co.of America et al.148 F.2d 416. 被引量:1
  • 8United Brands v Commission(case 27/76)[1978] ECR 207 被引量:1
  • 9[1978]1 CMLR 429 Court of Justice of the European Communities. 被引量:1
  • 10United Brands Co.and United Brands Continental BV v.Commission(27/76)14 Feb.1978 E.C.R.207,paras.248-249. 被引量:1

共引文献28

引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部