摘要
如何建立能包容更多社会需求和因素的法律范式,是法律体系乃至转型社会不断追问的话题。作为能动司法的学术回应,回应型法是开放、参与、更具张力、更能反映社会变革所需的法律范式,是法之"应然"与"实然"结合的产物,并促使新型的普遍服从的文明秩序的建立,契合了中国法律范式的发展要求。只是,中国仍处于从压制型法向自治型法过渡的阶段。尽管存在人为导入回应型法因素和直接从压制型法过渡到回应型法的契机,但这却不利于整体法律建构。因此,中国欲迈向回应型法,需要切实的法治秩序建构。
How to establish a legal paradigm with more social needs and factors has been a heated issue for the legal system and transitional societies. As an academic response to judicial activism, responsive laws are open, participative and flexible, which represent more social change needs. As a product of legal ＂ideal＂ and ＂factual＂ integration, they contribute to the establishment of new and universally accepted civil order, which fit the requirement for developing China＇s legal paradigm. However, China is still in transition from repressive laws to autonomous laws. Despite the possibility of man-made introduction of responsive laws and the direct transition from repressive laws to autonomous laws, it is not conducive to the overall legal construction. Therefore, China should rely on an effective construction of legal order in the process of moving towards responsive laws.
出处
《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第2期193-197,共5页
Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基金
国家社会科学基金重点资助项目(14AFX004)
中国人民大学2014年度拔尖创新人才培育资助计划成果资助项目
关键词
转型社会
压制型法
自治型法
回应型法
法治
transitional society
repressive law
autonomous law
responsive law
rule of law
