期刊文献+

前列腺腺癌患者年龄和Gleason评分相关性分析 被引量:5

Age correlates with Gleason score in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨前列腺腺癌患者年龄与Gleason评分(Gleason score,GS)的相关性。方法:研究674例患者年龄和GS均值以及不同组别均值;不同GS和年龄组别所占比例;年龄与GS、主要分级以及次要分级的相关性。结果:患者年龄25-96(70.22±8.26)岁,Gleason 6分、7分、8分、9分及10分组年龄分别为(69.06±8.35)、(70.55±8.16)、(70.99±6.54)、(71.56±9.18)岁及(72.79±11.36)岁。GS(7.08±1.09)分,主要分级(3.54±0.72)级,次要分级(3.53±0.66)级;〈60、60-69、70-79及≥80岁组GS分别为(6.86±1.10)、(6.99±1.10)、(7.08±1.04)分及(7.38±1.23)分。Gleason 6分、7分以及≥8分分别占37.7%、34.3%以及28.0%。患者年龄〈60岁组占10.5%(71/674),60-69岁组占30.6%(206/674),70-79岁组占47.6%(321/674),≥80岁组占11.3%(76/674)。患者年龄与GS具有显著相关性(r^2=0.013,P=0.003),与主要分级具有显著相关性(r^2=0.014,P=0.002),与次要分级无显著有相关性(r^2=0.005,P=0.055)。结论:在前列腺腺癌患者中≥70岁者所占比例较高;GS≥7分所占比例较高;但年龄与GS具有相关性,年龄对GS的预测价值不大。 Objective: To investigate the correlation between age and Gleason score (GS) in patients with prostate adenocarci- noma. Methods: This study included 674 patients with pathologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma. We determined the GS, primary grade, and secondary grade of the cases, and compared them among different age groups. Results : The mean age of the patients was (70.22 ± 8.26) yr, ranging from 25 to 96 years, (69.06 ± 8.35) yr in those with GS 6, (70.55 ± 8.16) yr in GS 7, (70.99 ± 6.54) yrinGS8, (71.56±9.18) yrinGS9, and (72.79±11.36) inGS 10. The mean GS, primary grade, and secondary grade were 7.08 ±1.09, 3.54 ±0.72, and 3.53±0.66, respectively, and the mean GSs in the 〈60 yr, 60 -69 yr, 70-79 yr, and ≥ 80 yr groups were 6. 86 ± 1.10,6.99 ±1.10,7.08 ±1.04, and 7.38 ±1.23, respectively. Those withGS 6, 7, and ≥ 8 accounted for 37.7% , 34.3% , and 28.0% , respectively. The patients aged 〈 60, 60 - 69, 70 - 79, and 〉t 80 years constituted 10.5% (71/674), 30.6% (206/674), 47.6% (321/674), and 11.3% (76/674), respectively. The age of the patients was significantly correlated with GS (r^2 = 0.013, P = 0. 003 ) and the primary grade (r^2 = 0. 014, P = 0.002), hut not the secondary grade ( r^2 = 0. 005, P = 0.055 ). Conclusion : Of the prostate adenocarcinoma patients, those aged ≥ 70 years form a larger proportion, and those with GS ≥ 7 comprise a higher percentage. The age of the patient is correlated with Gleason score but has a limited value in its prediction.
出处 《中华男科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第2期140-143,共4页 National Journal of Andrology
关键词 前列腺腺癌 年龄 GLEASON评分 相关性 prostate adenocarcinoma age Gleason score correlation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Richstone L, Bianco F J, Shah HH, et al. Radical prostatectomy in men aged > or =70 years: Effect of age on upgrading, upsta- ging, and the accuracy of a preoperative nomogram. BJU Int, 2008, 101(5) : 541-546. 被引量:1
  • 2Isariyawongse BK, Sun L, Ba:ez LL, et al. Significant discrepancies between diagnostic and pathologic Gleason sums in prostate canc- er: The predictive role of age and prostate-specific antigen. Urol- ogy, 2008, 72(4) : 882-886. 被引量:1
  • 3Russo AL, Chen MH, Aizer AA, et al. Advancing age within es- tablished Gleason score categories and the risk of prostate cancer- specific mortality (PCSM). BJU Int, 2012, 110 (7) : 973-979. 被引量:1
  • 4Eble JN, Santer G, Epstein JI, et aL World Health Organization Classfication of Tumors. Pathology and genetics of tumors of the urinary system and male genital organs. IARC Press, 2004, 179- 184. 被引量:1
  • 5Antunes AA, Crippa A, Dall'Oglio MF, et al. Age impact in clini- copathologie presentation and the clinical evolution of prostate cancer in patients submitted to radical prostatectomy. Int Braz J Urol, 2006, 32(1) : 48-55. 被引量:1
  • 6Gershman B, Dahl DM, Olumi AF, et al. Smaller prostate gland size and older age predict Gleason score upgrading. Urol Oncol, 2013, 31(7) : 1033-1037. 被引量:1
  • 7Alibhai SM, Krahn MD, Fleshner NE, et al. The association be- tween patient age and prostate cancer stage and grade at diagno- sis. BJU Int, 2004, 94(3): 303-306. 被引量:1
  • 8Antunes AA, Leite KR, Dall" Oglio MF, et al. Prostate biopsy : Is age important for determining the pathological features in pros- tate cancer? Int Braz J Urol, 2005, 31 (4) : 331-337. 被引量:1
  • 9汪朔,谢立平,沈华锋,郑祥毅,秦杰,白宇,张晨光,陈昭典,蔡松良,张志根,任国平,王丽君,余心如.346例前列腺癌的Gleason评分分布特征及其与临床分期的关系[J].中华男科学杂志,2006,12(8):689-692. 被引量:12
  • 10高洪文,王功伟,陈世范,姚敏,武艳,王伟华,赵雪俭.长春市15192例男性前列腺癌集团筛查结果分析[J].中国男科学杂志,2007,21(12):21-24. 被引量:6

二级参考文献13

共引文献15

同被引文献36

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部