摘要
2012年国际体育仲裁院裁决中国运动员廖辉的禁赛期从4年缩减至2年。该案反映出国际体育仲裁院在反兴奋剂案件中所坚持的一贯实践:应适用世界反兴奋剂条例来解决反兴奋剂规则间的冲突,格式条款的解释应有利于相对方运动员。此外,该案对协调反兴奋剂规则之间不同的处罚标准以及保障运动员的合法权益都具有一定程度的启示意义。
in 2012,Court of Arbitration for Sport delivered an arbitral award which reduced the period of ineligibility imposed on Chinese athlete Liao Hui from 4 years to 2 years. This case reflected what were Court of Arbitration for Sport insisted on in the arbitration,including applied World Anti- Doping Code to resolve the conflict between deferent Anti- Doping regulations and made a arbitration award which was better for athletes. In addition,this case inspired on harmonization of sanction standards in the area of Anti- Doping and protected the lawful rights and interests of athletes in the certain extent.
出处
《西安体育学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第1期16-21,共6页
Journal of Xi'an Physical Education University
基金
国家哲学社会科学基金项目(11CFX076)
关键词
国际体育仲裁院
世界反兴奋剂条例
格式条款解释
Court of Arbitration for Sport
World Anti-Doping Code
dubio contra proferentem
