期刊文献+

Enhanced Total Ionizing Dose Hardness of Deep Sub-Micron Partially Depleted Silicon-on-Insulator n-Type Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field Effect Transistors by Applying Larger Back-Gate Voltage Stress

Enhanced Total Ionizing Dose Hardness of Deep Sub-Micron Partially Depleted Silicon-on-Insulator n-Type Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field Effect Transistors by Applying Larger Back-Gate Voltage Stress
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Owing to the fifll isolation and minimization of the silicon active volume, silicon-on-insulator (SOI) tech- nology has better resistance against transient ionizing effects like single event effects (SEE) or latch up.However, the total ionizing dose (TID) irradiation responses of SOI transistors are more complex than bulk-silicon devices. In addition to the gate and par- asitic field leakage current, which are common to SOI and bulk-silicon devices, irradiation induced charges trapped in the SOI buried oxide (BOX) can also affect SOI device performance. Typically, there is a par- asitic edge transistor in the back-gate of SOI devices paralleled with the main transistor, which is formed by the corner region of the silicon island. Due to the high electric field induced by the back-gate voltage at the corner of the silicon island, the threshold of the parasitic edge transistor is lower than the main transistor, resulting in a sub-threshold hump in the transfer characteristic of the back-gate transistor. Even though the threshold of the parasitic edge tran- sistor is lower than the main transistor, it is still larger than zero, which has no effect on the front- gate of devices. However, the sub-threshold hump in the back-gate is the 'Achilles heel' for total dose responses of deep sub-micron SOI n-type metal-oxide- semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) iso- lated by shallow trench isolation (STI). As reported in Refs., the threshold of the parasitic edge transis- tor is negative shifted by radiation-induced charges trapped in STI, leading to off-state leakage in the front-gate of devices. Owing to the fifll isolation and minimization of the silicon active volume, silicon-on-insulator (SOI) tech- nology has better resistance against transient ionizing effects like single event effects (SEE) or latch up.However, the total ionizing dose (TID) irradiation responses of SOI transistors are more complex than bulk-silicon devices. In addition to the gate and par- asitic field leakage current, which are common to SOI and bulk-silicon devices, irradiation induced charges trapped in the SOI buried oxide (BOX) can also affect SOI device performance. Typically, there is a par- asitic edge transistor in the back-gate of SOI devices paralleled with the main transistor, which is formed by the corner region of the silicon island. Due to the high electric field induced by the back-gate voltage at the corner of the silicon island, the threshold of the parasitic edge transistor is lower than the main transistor, resulting in a sub-threshold hump in the transfer characteristic of the back-gate transistor. Even though the threshold of the parasitic edge tran- sistor is lower than the main transistor, it is still larger than zero, which has no effect on the front- gate of devices. However, the sub-threshold hump in the back-gate is the 'Achilles heel' for total dose responses of deep sub-micron SOI n-type metal-oxide- semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) iso- lated by shallow trench isolation (STI). As reported in Refs., the threshold of the parasitic edge transis- tor is negative shifted by radiation-induced charges trapped in STI, leading to off-state leakage in the front-gate of devices.
出处 《Chinese Physics Letters》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2014年第12期82-84,共3页 中国物理快报(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Schwank J t{, Cavrois V F and Shaneyfelt M R 2003 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 50 522. 被引量:1
  • 2Bi J S, Liu G, Luo J J and Han Z S 2013 Aeta Phys. Sin. 62 208501 (in Chinese). 被引量:1
  • 3Zhang Y W, Huang H X, Bi D W, Tang M H and Zhang Z X 2014 Nuel. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 745 128. 被引量:1
  • 4Ning B X, Hu Z Y, Zhang Z X, Bi D W, Huang H X, Dai R F, Zhang Y W and Zou S C 2013 Aeta Phys. Sin. 62 076104. 被引量:1
  • 5Huang H X, Bi D W, Peng C, Zhang Y W and Zhang Z X 2013 Chin. Phys. Lett. 30 080701. 被引量:1
  • 6Melanie 5 S, Isabel Y Y, Dimitri A A and Brian S D 1996 Proceedings 1996 IEEE International SOI Conference (Sanibel Island, FL 30 September-03 October 1996) p 84. 被引量:1
  • 7Mei B, Bi J S, Li D L, Liu S and Han Z S 2012 J. Semieond. 33 024002. 被引量:1
  • 8Ning B X, Bi D W, Huang H X, Zhang Z X, Chen M and Zhou S C 2013 Microelectronics J. 44 86. 被引量:1
  • 9Ning B X, Bi D W, Huang H X, Zhang Z X, Hu Z Y, Chen M and Zhou S C 2013 Mieroelectronics Reliability 53 259. 被引量:1
  • 10Jeffrey W S, Chuan L and Gregory 1999 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 20 248. 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部