期刊文献+

技术人工物的功能理论及其重构 被引量:6

原文传递
导出
摘要 当代技术哲学领域中,技术人工物的相关研究已处于核心地位。目前对技术人工物的研究呈现出以功能研究为核心的特征,旨在通过技术哲学的基本理论对技术人工物的功能和各种功能现象做出解释,建立较完善的技术人工物功能理论。使用一计划进路下的意向性一因果角色一进化论功能理论在此背景下应运而生。本文基于传统功能理论及其对技术人工物功能失常的解释困境,试图全面分析意向性一因果角色一进化论功能理论对传统功能理论的超越及其重构。
作者 陈凡 徐佳
出处 《哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第12期94-100,共7页 Philosophical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1孙宇浩,傅小兰.人造物概念的表征:功能、意图和目的论的解释[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(4):466-478. 被引量:4
  • 2Bigelow, J. and Pargetter, R. , 1987,“Functions”,in The Journal of Philosophy 84 (4). 被引量:1
  • 3Cummins, R.,1975,“ Function analysis”,in The Journal of Philosophy 72 (20). 被引量:1
  • 4Griffiths,P. E.,1993 , “Functional analysis and proper functions” , in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (3 ). 被引量:1
  • 5Houkes, W. and Vermaas, P. E.,2004, “Actions versus functions: a plea for an alternative metaphysics of artifacts”, in The Monist 87 (1). 被引量:1
  • 62010, Technical Functions : On the Use and Design of Artefacts, Netherlands : Springer Press. 被引量:1
  • 7Kitcher, P. S.,1993, “Function and design”,in P. A. French, T. E. Uehling and H. K. Wettstein ( eds. ),Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press (Vol. XVIII) ; Reprinted in Allen et al, 1998. 被引量:1
  • 8Kroes, P.,2001,“Technical functions as dispositions: a critical assessment”,in Techn^ 5 (3). 被引量:1
  • 9Kroes, P. and Meijers, A.,2001,“ Introduction: a discipline in search of its identity ,in P. Kroes, and A. Meijers ( eds. ),The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology, Amsterdam : JAI Press, Elsevier Science Ltd. 被引量:1
  • 10Krohs,U. and Kroes,P.,2009,Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds : Comparative Philosophical Perspectives, Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 被引量:1

二级参考文献71

  • 1Mahon B Z, Caramazza A. Constraining questions about the organisation and representation of conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2003, 20(3-6):433~450 被引量:1
  • 2Mandler J M. Thought before language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2004, 8:508~513 被引量:1
  • 3Tyler L, Moss H. Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2001,5(6): 244~252 被引量:1
  • 4Rogers T T, Lambon Ralph M A, Garrard P, Bozeat S,McClelland J L, Hodges J R, Patterson K. Structure and Deterioration of Semantic Memory: A Neuropsychological and Computational Investigation* 1. Psychological Review,2004, 111(1): 205~235 被引量:1
  • 5Cree G S, McRae K. Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk,cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 2003, 132(2): 163~201 被引量:1
  • 6Moss H, Tyler L. Weighing up the facts of category-specific semantic deficits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2003, 7(11): 480~481 被引量:1
  • 7Tyler L K, Bright P, Dick E, Tavares P, Pilgrim L, Fletcher P, Greef M, Moss H. Do semantic categories activate distinct cortical regions? Evidence for a distributed neural semantic system. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2003,20(3-6): 541~559 被引量:1
  • 8Murphy G L. The big book of concepts. 2002: Cambridge,MA, US: MIT Press 被引量:1
  • 9Ross B H, Murphy G L. Food for thought:Cross-classification and category organization in a complex real-world domain. Cognitive Psychology, 1999,38(4): 495~553 被引量:1
  • 10Chaigueau S E, Barsalou L W, Sloman S A. Assessing the Causal Structure of Function. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2004, 133(4): 601~625 被引量:1

共引文献3

同被引文献83

引证文献6

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部