摘要
一种纯语义学的意义概念是能够得到界定的,因而除了与数学和/或逻辑有关的那些承诺,并不需要妄称其他更多东西。自然语言的语义学可以充当一种逻辑分析法,而且这能为分析性与综合性之间的严格分界提供辩护。事实上,奎因并非驳斥而只是拒绝了对于自然语言进行逻辑分析的思路,因此,分析与综合之间的区分并不过时。
Basing on the analytical critique in the first half of this paper on Quine's 'universal revisability thesis', the author goes on arguing that a purely semantic notion of meaning is definable. Thus,one needs no more pretentious commitments than those ones connected with mathematics. At last, the author is capable to show that semantics of natural language as a logical analysis is possible and it can justify hard and fast line between analyticity and syntheticity. As a matter of fact, Quine only refused rather than refuted the idea of doing logical analyses of natural language, and the distinction between analytic and synthetic is not out of date at all.
出处
《哲学分析》
2014年第5期51-67,共17页
Philosophical Analysis
基金
捷克国家基金项目"语用学的语义化"(项目编号:401/07/0451)的支持
关键词
分析性
综合性
内涵
构造
概念
语用学
analytic
synthetic
intension
constructions
concepts
pragmatics
