期刊文献+

国外图书馆行业组织LIS教育认证标准及其质量控制要素研究 被引量:6

LIS Program Accreditation Standards Developed by Professional Association and Quality Control Elements in Developed Countries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在美国、英国和澳大利亚等发达国家已经形成了政府、大学和专业团体合作发展和提供图书馆与情报学教育的质量保障制度,图书馆行业组织在制定专业教育质量标准、进行教育项目认证、确保专业教育质量和专业人员资格准入方面起着关键作用。国际层面,IFLA通过制定教育指南努力建立国际统一的教育质量保障机制。美国图书馆协会的认证层次为硕士教育层次,英国、澳大利亚和IFLA认证或规范层次则包括本科和硕士层次。这些国家和组织所制定的LIS教育项目认证标准中基本涵盖了如下质量要素:项目使命和培养目标、学生学习结果(专业知识和能力、通用技能、专业伦理和价值观)、课程内容、课程设计和提供方式、教师队伍、学生、行政管理和经费、支持资源、系统规划和评估等。在当前高等教育质量评估或保障机制趋向结果导向背景下,学生学习结果这一要素的重要性日益凸显。 Professional education quality assurance systems of Library and information studies were developed under cooperation of government, university and professional bodies in US, UK and Australia. Professional bodies, such as ALA, CILIP, ALIA, played an important role in developing educational standards and course accreditation. IFLA devoted to develop an international quality assurance model for equivalency and reciprocity of qualification. The accrediting program level in US was master degree. Bachelor and postgraduate level program were both accredited in UK and Australia. There were several quality elements in the current standards or guidelines which included program mission, goals and objectives; student learning outcome, such as professional core knowledge and competences, general skills, and professional ethics and values; curriculum, such as course content, design and deliver system; faculty and staff; students; administration management and fund; resources; and systematic plan and evaluation. Students leaning outcome were central in current LIS professional education quality assurance system under outcome-oriented higher education evaluation context.
出处 《图书情报知识》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期12-25,共14页 Documentation,Information & Knowledge
关键词 图书馆与情报学专业教育 质量保障制度 教育认证标准 质量要素 内容分析法 LIS professional program Quality assurance system Accreditation standards Quality elements Content analysis method
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Rochester M K. Education for librarianship[M]. London: Mansell, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 2Hallam G. Australian Library and Information Association Course Accreditation Review 2013 [ R/OL ]. [2014-09-01]. ht- tps://www, alia. org. au/sites/default/files/documents/Web- site % 20ALIA % 20Accreditation % 20 Environmental % 20Scan % 202013 % 20Dr % 20Gill % 20Hallam. pdf. 被引量:1
  • 3Tammaro A M. Report on Quality Assurance models in LIS programs 2005[R/OL]. [2014-09-19]. http://www, if- la. org/files/assets/set/s23_Report-QA-2005, pdf. 被引量:1
  • 4Ocholla D N, Britz J Assessment and Evaluation of LIS Educa- tion: Global Commonalities and Regional Differences [ J/OLI. [2014-09-19 ]. http://www, l is. uzulu ac za/research/2012/ OchollaBritzSCECSAL, % 202012, UZ, UWM, % 201W pdf. 被引量:1
  • 5Selden W K, Porter H V Accreditation Its Purposes and Uses [M]. Washington, D.C.: The Council on Postsecondary Ac- creditation, 1977. 被引量:1
  • 6Young K E The Changing Scope of Accreditation[C]. //Under- standing Accreditation, edited by Young K E et al San Fran- cisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983:1-15. 被引量:1
  • 7图书馆学教指委会议:重点讨论《本科图书馆学教学质量国家标准》(讨论稿)[OL].[2014-09-14].http://blogsinacomcn/s/blog一4fcba36bO102eb8hhtml. 被引量:1
  • 8叶继元.图书情报学教育质量及其共性与个性评价探讨[J].大学图书馆学报,2011,29(5):10-14. 被引量:6
  • 9刘瑞华,郑瑜.建立中国图书馆学情报学教育指南的构想[J].情报资料工作,2011,32(1):102-105. 被引量:3
  • 10王梅玲.美国图书馆与资讯科学教育的认可制度与标准[J/OL].[2014-09-20].http://jlislisntuedutw/article/015-4pdf. 被引量:1

二级参考文献53

共引文献25

同被引文献127

引证文献6

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部