期刊文献+

营养风险筛查在结直肠癌快速康复外科治疗中的作用 被引量:5

The Role of Nutrition Risk Screening in Fast Track Surgery of Colorectal Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨营养风险筛查在结直肠癌快速康复外科治疗中的作用,提高结直肠癌患者术后的营养状况和胃肠道免疫功能,促进胃肠道功能的恢复。方法:收集60例结直肠癌择期手术患者,并将其随机分为快速康复组(FTS)和传统治疗组,分别用快速康复措施和传统方法进行围手术期的处理,其中引入术前营养风险筛查和预防性营养干预,比较两组患者的术后营养状况与胃肠道免疫功能及术后肛门排气时间、术后住院日、住院总费用的差异。结果:与传统组相比,FTS组术后血清白蛋白(ABL)水平明显升高(P<0.01),C反应蛋白(CRP)水平明显降低(P<0.01),术后胃肠功能恢复更早,术后住院日更短(P<0.05),但两组的住院总费用和并发症的发生率比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:术前营养风险筛查并营养干有助于结直肠癌的快速康复外科治疗。 Objective: To investigate the role of nutrition risk screening in fast track surgery of colorectal cancer, improve the postoperative nutritional status and immune function of gastrointestinal tract of colorectal cancer patients, and promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function. Methods: 60 patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgery were selected and divided into FTS group and the control group, which were treated respectively with different measures, including preoperative nutritional risk screening and preventative nutrition intervention. The postoperative nutritional status and immune function, the time of first bowel movement, hospital stays, the complication rate and hospitalization costs were compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with that of the control group, the ABL level of FTS group was much higher (P〈0.05), the CRP level was significantly lower (P〈0.05), the recovery of gastrointestinal function after operation was much earlier (P〈0.05), and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter(P〈0.05). However, no significant difference was found in the hospitalization cost and incidence rates of adverse reactions between the two groups(P〉0.05). Conclusion: Preoperative nutritional screening contributed to the FTS of colorectal cancer.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2014年第30期5926-5929,共4页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(81272204)
关键词 营养风险筛查 结直肠癌 快速康复外科 Nutrition risk screening Colorectal surger Fast-track surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Kehlet H,Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgicaloutcome [J]. Am J Surg, 2002.183(6):630-641. 被引量:1
  • 2陈平,丁国平,易占波,等.快速康复外科理念在胃癌围手术期治疗中的应用[A].2009年浙江省肠外肠内营养学学术年会论文汇编[C].2009. 被引量:1
  • 3Baik S H, Gincherman M, Mutch M G, et al. Laparoscopic vs openresection for patients with rectal cancer: cpmparison of perioperativeoutcomes and long-term survival [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2011,54(1):6-14. 被引量:1
  • 4Fujii S, Ota M, Ichikawa Y,et al. Comparison of short, long-termsurgical outcomes and mid-term health-related quality of life afterlaparoscopic and open resection for colorectal cancer: a case-matchedcontrol studyfJ]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2010, 25(11):1311-1323. 被引量:1
  • 5Law W L, Poon J T, Fan J K,et al. Comparison of outcome of openand laparoscopic resection for stage II and stagelll rectal cancer [J].Ann Surg Oncol, 2009,16(6):1488-1493. 被引量:1
  • 6Haverkamp M P, de Roos M A, Ong K H. The ERAS protocol reduces the length of stay after laparoscopic colectomies [J]. Surgical endoscopy, 2012, 26(2): 361-367. 被引量:1
  • 7Kehlet H. Fast-track surgery-an update on physiological care principlesto enhance recovery [J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2011, 396 (5):585-590. 被引量:1
  • 8李显蓉,盛云建,杨庆强.快速康复外科在腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术围手术期应用疗效的荟萃分析[J].实用医学杂志,2012,28(8):1265-1268. 被引量:35
  • 9Rasian M, Gonzalez MC, Goncalves Dias MC, et al. Comparison of nutritional risk screening tools for predicting clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients.[J]. Nutrition, 2010, 26(78): 721-726. 被引量:1
  • 10杜小亮,陈冬利,王为忠.常用的营养风险筛查方法[J].肠外与肠内营养,2010,17(5):309-312. 被引量:36

二级参考文献99

  • 1Ned Abraham,Sinan Albayati.Enhanced recovery after surgery programs hasten recovery after colorectal resections[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery,2011,3(1):1-6. 被引量:56
  • 2陈伟,蒋朱明,张永梅,王秀荣,陈春明,史轶蘩.欧洲营养不良风险调查方法在中国住院患者的临床可行性研究[J].中国临床营养杂志,2005,13(3):137-141. 被引量:215
  • 3Lochs H, Allison SP, Meier R, et al. Introductory to the ESPEN guiderlines in enteral nutrition:terminology, definitions and general topics. Clin Nuix ,2006,25 ( 2 ) : 180-186. 被引量:1
  • 4Kondmp J,Allison SP, Elia M, et al. ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr,2003,22(4) :415-421. 被引量:1
  • 5Fettes SB, Davidson HIM, Richardoson RA, et al. Nutritional status of elective gastrointestinal surgery patients pre and post-operatively. Clin Nutr,2002,21 (3) :249-251. 被引量:1
  • 6Waitzberg DL, Caiafa WT, Correia MITD. Hospital malnutrition : the Brazilian national survey (IBRANUTRI) :astudy of 4000 patients. Nut rition ,2001,17 (7-8) :573-580. 被引量:1
  • 7Kruizenga HM, Wierdsma NJ, Van Bokhorst MAE,et al. Screening of nutritional status in the Netherlands. Clin Nutr,2003,22 (2) :147-152. 被引量:1
  • 8Gazzotti C,Albert A, Pepinster A, et al. Clinical usefulness of the mini nutritional assessment (MNA)scale in geriatric medicine. J Nutr Health Aging ,2000,4 (3) :176-181. 被引量:1
  • 9Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP, et al. What is subjeetive global assessment of nutritional status. JPEN, 1987,11 ( 1 ) :8-13. 被引量:1
  • 10Sungurtekin H, Sungurtekin U, Balei C, et al. The influence of nutritional status of complications after major intraabdominal surgery. J Am Coil Nutr,2004,23 (3) :227-232. 被引量:1

共引文献231

同被引文献56

引证文献5

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部