摘要
德、日刑法通说关于构成事实错误与不能犯之间是正反面对应关系的传统命题存在重大问题。要维持这一命题的正确性,必须剔除打击错误、因果历程错误、主体不能等不应属于构成事实错误或不能犯的内容。不能犯的独特结构决定了它不具有可罚性,德、日刑法在不能犯立法例上的不同不是关于可罚性的差异,对此我国学者存在认识误区。不能犯不可罚不等于不能犯行为人必定不犯罪,以此来解释和指导我国司法实践,才能实现逻辑周延和体系协调。
Both positive and negative relationship crimes＇ misunderstanding on their own criminal behaviors and unrealized offense in both Germany and Japan, as a traditional proposition, have significant problems. In order to maintain the correctness of this proposition, it is necessary to avoid the mistake of wrong＇fully cracking down crime, ？ the mistake of causation, and the fact that impossibility of subjects does not belong to crimes＇ misunderstanding on their own criminal behaviors or unrealized offense. The unique structure of unrealized offense determines that this offense cannot be punished. Unrealized offense does not mean that the offenders of unrealized offense will not commit crimes. Only after acknowledging this and using this to guide and explain judicial practices in China, China can achieve systematic coordination.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第5期180-200,共21页
China Legal Science
基金
江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究基金指导项目(项目编号:2014SJD028)
江苏省法学会法学研究青年项目(项目编号:SFH2014C13)的阶段性成果
