摘要
我国司法实践中关于具体打击错误的认定标准,应当说既不是具体符合说,也不是法定符合说,而是基于"社会危害性"这一价值判断的"社会危害性相同说"。该说认为,如果在同一构成要件内目标结果与偏差结果具有相同的社会危害性,就肯定故意既遂的成立。其能为司法实践所认可,本身即说明它具有合理性,而这种实践优越性又有必要不断提炼、上升到理论高度,尤其要弥补其中的某些不足。为此,应当确立一种"原则—例外"模式,也就是,原则上肯定具体打击错误不阻却故意既遂,但在特殊情况下,例外地否定故意既遂,按照故意未遂和过失既遂的想象竞合定罪处罚。
The identification standard of aberratio ictus in China’s judicial practice should be said to be neither the specific conformity theory nor the legal conformity theory,but the theory of identical social harmfulness based on the value judgment of"social harmfulness".The doctrine holds that the establishment of an intentional attempt is affirmed if the target result and the deviant result have the same social harm within the same constituent element.Although it is recognized by judicial practice,it still has some shortcomings.Therefore,it is necessary to establish a"principle-exception"model,that is,affirming that the aberratio ictus does not prevent the intentional accomplishment in principle,but in special cases,denying the intentional accomplishment with exception,and concurring the punishment of ideal jointed offence of the attempt and the negligent accomplishment.
出处
《法学评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第6期173-182,共10页
Law Review
关键词
具体打击错误
法定符合说
社会危害性相同说
“原则—例外”模式
Aberratio Ictus
Legal According Theory
The Theory of Identical Social Harmfulness
"Principle-Exception"Model
