期刊文献+

国际法上的民族自决权原则:基于《联合国宪章》和国际法院的解释 被引量:6

National Self-determination Principle in International Law:Interpretations Based on The Chart of United Nations and Practice in I.C.J.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 民族自决权在推动民族独立、建立民族国家,以及殖民地人民摆脱殖民统治的运动中发挥过巨大作用。虽然它已发展成一项国际法基本原则,但从国际法律文件和国际法院的实践来看,其适用和行使有严格限制。民族自决权的行使不能破坏国家政治统一和领土完整,且主要适用于联合国托管下的非自治领土和处于殖民统治或异族压迫下的民族。此外,是否允许既存国家的一部分从该国脱离,各国分歧很大。因此,国际法上的民族自决权原则还很不成熟,不应成为一国国内的少数人群体脱离本国的理论依据。 The right of national self-determination has played a great role in the campaign to promote national independence and decolonization.Although it has developed into a basic principle of international law,but there are strict restrictions on its application.The exercise of national self-determination should not damage the sovereignty and territorial integrity and mainly applies to the Non-Self-Governing Territories and the people under colonial or alien exploitation.The practices among states differ greatly on whether to allow the existing part secede from its nation.Therefore,the immature principle of national selfdetermination is far from the principal that any nation has the right to determine their own political status and secede from its homeland.
作者 张颖军
出处 《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期112-116,共5页 Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目(13AMZ064)
关键词 国际法 民族自决权 人权 少数人权利 international law national self-determination human rights minority
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献26

  • 1Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons.Advisory Opinion of 8 July 1996. 被引量:1
  • 2Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territor[Z].Advisory Opinion of 9 July 2004,para.106. 被引量:1
  • 3Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v.Uganda)[Z].Judgment of 19 December 2005,paras. 被引量:1
  • 4[奥]曼弗雷德·诺瓦克著,毕小青,孙世彦译.民权公约评注:联合国《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》[Z].北京:三联书店. 被引量:1
  • 5Corfu Channel (United Kingdom v.Albania)[Z].Judgment of 9 April 1949. 被引量:1
  • 6Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v.United States of America)[Z].Judgment of 27June 1986. 被引量:1
  • 7Dietrich Schindler.Human Rights and Humanitarian Law:Interrelationship of the Laws[J].American University International Law Review,Vol.31,1982. 被引量:1
  • 8Thomas Buergenthal.To Respect and To Ensure:State Obligations and Permissible Derogations.in Louis Henkin (ed.),The International Bill of Rights:The Covenant on Civil and Political Rights[C].Columbia University Press,1981 Theodor Meron.Extraterritoriality of Human Rights Treaties[J].American Journal of International Law,Vol 89,1995. 被引量:1
  • 9Lóez Burgos v.Uruguay[Z],Human Rights Committee,6June 1979,UN Doc.A/36/40,176,§ 12.3. 被引量:1
  • 10Barcelona Traction,Light and Power Company,Limited (New Application:1962) (Belgium v.Spain)[Z],Second Phase,Judgment of 5 February 1970. 被引量:1

共引文献27

同被引文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部