期刊文献+

评判性思维教学法在护理技能训练中的应用 被引量:9

Application of critical thinking teaching on nursing skills training
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨评判性思维教学法在护理本科生护理技能训练中的作用。方法将河北中医学院2010级护理本科生118名分为两组,在实习前1个月开设护理技能训练课程,实验组(60名)运用Taba教学法和反思日记法,对照组(58名)则采用传统的教学方法,技能训练结束后,比较两组学生的评判性思维能力和技能训练成绩。结果实验组护生护理技能训练[(92.21±4.27)分]以及评判性思维的寻求真相[(39.88±2.76)分]、分析能力[(44.30±2.28)分]、自信心[(43.32±6.18)分]、求知欲[(46.47±4.01)分]、总分[(298.03±10.52)分]与对照组[护生护理技能训练平均(90.11±5.21)分以及评判性思维的寻求真相(38.07±3.23)分、分析能力(42.79±2.61)分、自信心(39.91±2.42)分、求知欲(44.83±4.57)分、总分(288.02±10.59)分]比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论评判性思维教学法有助于提高护理本科生护理技能训练效果。 Objective To expound the effect of critical thinking teaching on nursing skills training in nursing undergraduates. Methods Nursing skills training course was provided for undergraduate nursing students, one month before their internship. 2010 nursing students were divided into control group(58 students) and experiment group(60 students).The method of Taba teaching and diary reflection were used in experiment group, while traditional method was used in control group. The students' ability of critical thinking and nursing skills training result were compared between the two groups after the training. Results The average scores of nursing skills training [(92.21 ±4.27) scores], truth-seeking[(39.88±2.76) scores], analyticity [(44.30±2.28) scores], confidence [(43.32±6.18) scores], thirst for knowledge [(46.47±4.01) scores] and total scores [(298.03±10.52) scores] of critical thinking in the experiment group were significantly higher than those in the control group [(90.11±5.21),(38.07±3.23),(42.79±2.61),(39.91±2.42),(44.83±4.57),(288.02±10.59) scores], the differences were statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion Critical thinking teaching method can enhance the effect of nursing skills training in nursing undergraduates.
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2014年第19期127-130,共4页 China Medical Herald
基金 河北省高等教育科学研究重点课题(编号GJX-HZ2013-16)
关键词 评判性思维 Taba教学法 反思日记法 护理本科生 护理技能训练 Critical thinking Taba teaching Diary reflection Nursing undergraduates Nursing skills training
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献94

共引文献2030

同被引文献85

  • 1彭美慈,汪国成,陈基乐,陈满辉,白洪海,李守国,李继平,蔡芸芳,王君俏,殷磊.批判性思维能力测量表的信效度测试研究[J].中华护理杂志,2004,39(9):644-647. 被引量:1858
  • 2许虹,彭美慈,汪国成,陈基乐,胡一平,汪国建.护理本科生评判性思维能力特征及相关因素的分析[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(2):155-157. 被引量:149
  • 3成静.不同年级本科护生评判性思维能力的比较研究[J].护理研究(中旬版),2007,21(10):2658-2659. 被引量:35
  • 4Naber J, Wyatt TH. The effect of reflective writing inter- ventions on the critical thinking skills and dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students[J]. Nurse Education Today, 2014,34(1) ..67-72. 被引量:1
  • 5Gendrop SC, Eisenhauer LA. A transactional perspective on critical thinking [J]. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 1996,10(4) : 329-345. 被引量:1
  • 6Scheffer BK,Rubenfeld MG. A consensus statement on crit- ical thinking in nursing [J]. Journal of Nursing Education, 2000,39(8) : 352-359. 被引量:1
  • 7Yu DH, Zhang YQ, Xu Y, et al. Improvement in critical thinking dispositions of undergraduate nursing students through problem--based learning., a crossover--experimen- tal study [J]. Journal of Nursing Education, 2013,52 (10) 574-581. 被引量:1
  • 8Profetto--McGrath J. The relationship of critical thinking skills and critical thinking dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students [J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2003,43 (6) ,569-577. 被引量:1
  • 9Facione NC,Facione PA, Sanchez CA. Critical thinking dis- position as a measure of competent clinical judgment: The development of the California Critical Thinking DispositionInventory[J]. Journal of Nursing Education, 1994,33 (8) 345-350. 被引量:1
  • 10Zhang H, Lambert V. Critical thinking dispositions and learning styles of baccalaureate nursing students from China [J]. Nursing and Health Sciences, 2008,10 (3) .. 175-181. 被引量:1

引证文献9

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部