摘要
《民法总则》第153条第1款是强制性规范干预私法自治的引致与概括授权条款。鉴于社会转型时期特有的现实状况,在存疑时应将第153条第1款诠释为"原则有效,例外无效"的价值表达,以尽可能尊重市场主体的意思自治和保护交易安全。强制性规范的效力判断分为两个阶段:一是规范目的设定的合宜程度,着眼于强制性规范干预私法自治的正当性;二是规范目的和法律行为无效这一手段之间的理性联系,意指强制性规范干预私法自治的合理性。法律行为违法可划分为主体、目的、标的与程序性违法,应结合强制性规范的目的并依比例原则予以具体判断。
Article 153(1)of General Rules of the Civil Law is a general authorization clause for mandatory rules to interfere with autonomy of private law.In view of the unique reality in the period of social transformation,the clause above should be explained as "valid in general,invalid in particular"to respect the autonomy of the market participants and protect the transaction security as much as possible.Judgment on the effectiveness of mandatory rules is divided into two stages.The first stage is appropriate degree of normalized target setting,focusing on the legitimacy of mandatory rules interfering with autonomy of private law.The second stage is the rational connection between normalized target and invalidity of legal acts.The violation of legal action can be classified as subjects,purposes,objects and procedural violations,and should be specifically judged in accordance with the purpose of mandatory rules and the principle of proportionality.
作者
冉克平
Ran Keping(Law School,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,P.R.China)
出处
《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第1期145-157,共13页
Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
强制性规范
私法自治
规范目的
比例原则
目的理性
Mandatory provisions
Autonomy of private law
Normative purpose
Principle of proportionality
Rationality of purpose
