期刊文献+

调解、诉讼与公正——对现代自由社会和儒家传统的反思 被引量:71

Mediation,Litigation and Justice: Confucian Reflections in a Modern Liberal Society
下载PDF
导出
摘要 调解作为一种解决纷争的做法和制度 ,是我国传统法律文化尤其是儒家法律文化的重要部分。在现代法治社会中 ,调解否已经过时 ?本文首先介绍中国的调解传统的哲学基础、理论和实践 ,然后从现代自由主义和法治理想的角度 ,对传统的调解提出批判。本文进而指出 ,调解在当代的中国以至西方仍有顽强的生命力 ,西方学者对调解作为“解决纠纷的另类选择”之一提出了多种理论依据 ,其中不少与儒家传统的睿见不谋而合。本文的结论是 ,经过“创造性转化”后的调解理论与实践能对现代文明作出贡献 ,由此可见 ,传统文化遗产在现代仍是十分宝贵和有用的资源。 The practice and institution of mediation as a means of dispute settlement is an important element of traditional Chinese legal culture, particularly Confucian legal culture. Is mediation out-of-date in a modern society based on the Rule of Law? This article introduces the philosophical basis, theory and practice of the Chinese tradition of mediation, and sets out the criticisms of traditional mediation from the perspective of modern liberalism and the Rule of Law ideal. The article then points out that mediation is still alive and well in both China and the West, and discusses the defence of mediation as a means of 'Alternative Dispute Resolution' developed by Western scholars. It suggests that there is convergence between such contemporary Western thought and traditional Confucian thinking. The article concludes that the theory and practice of mediation as 'creatively transformed' can make a significant contribution to modern civilization, and that therefore the heritage of China's traditional culture is a valuable and useful resource for modernity.
作者 陈弘毅
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2001年第3期3-14,共12页 Modern Law Science
关键词 调解 诉讼 传统法律文化 儒家 法治 自由主义 创造性转化 权利 正义 公正 道德 mediation litigation tradition culture Confucianism modernity Rule of Law liberalism Alternative Dispute Resolution creative transformation rights justice morality
  • 相关文献

参考文献84

  • 1刘敏.论传统调解制度及其创造性转化—— 一种法文化学分析[J].社会科学研究,1999(1):57-62. 被引量:42
  • 2Albert H.Y. Chen. Toward a Legal Enlightenment: Discussions in Contemporary China on the Rule of Law[J]. UCLA Pacific Basic Law Journal 17.1999:125. 被引量:1
  • 3Michael Palmer and Simon Roberts. Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision Making[M]. London: Butterworths, 1998. 被引量:1
  • 4论语(汉英对照)[M](二).D.C.Lau译.香港:香港中文大学出版社,1992. 被引量:1
  • 5周易[A].理雅各译.汉英对照中国古典名著丛书[C].长沙:湖南出版社,1993. 被引量:1
  • 6礼记.礼运[M]. 被引量:2
  • 7张中秋著..中西法律文化比较研究[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1991:384.
  • 8张晋藩著..中国法律的传统与近代转型[M].北京:法律出版社,1997:475.
  • 9Derek Roebuck. The Background of the Common Law [M]. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1988,第5章. 被引量:1
  • 10史记.五帝本纪[M]. 被引量:2

二级参考文献5

共引文献111

同被引文献607

引证文献71

二级引证文献439

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部