摘要
目的比较不同等级杭白芍药材中儿茶素、芍药内酯苷、芍药苷3个有效成分的量。方法参照《七十六种药材商品规格标准》将所收集的杭白芍分为六个等级,采用高效液相色谱法测定杭白芍中3个有效成分的量。结果不同等级的杭白芍药材中3个成分的量没有规律性,以芍药苷为例,六等品样品(2-6)中芍药苷的量最高,远高于一等品(2-1)样品中的芍药苷的量。结论目前,杭白芍的等级划分标准不能全面的反映杭白芍的自身品质,也不符合按质论价的商业需求,应该结合药材中成分含有量来制定药材规格等级标准。
AIM To determine and compare the contents of catechin,albiflorin,and paeoniflorin in different grades of Hangzhou white peony. METHODS Reference to'seventy-six kinds of medicinal materials commodity specifications',the samples of Hangzhou white peony were divided into six grades. The contents of three components in different grade samples were determined by HPLC. RESULTS The contents of three components in different grades of Hangzhou white peony had no regularity. HPLC data showed that the paeoniflorin content in the sixth-grade sample( 2-6) presented the highest,much hipher than that in the first-grade( 2-1). CONCLUSION At present,traditional grading standards neither reflects the quality of Hangzhou white peony,nor meets business requirements of ″quality deciding price″. Therefore,it is suggested that the grading standards of Chinese medicinal materials should be established in combination with the contents of active components.
出处
《中成药》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2014年第2期358-362,共5页
Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine
基金
国家自然科学基金(81303224)
浙江省中医药科学研究基金计划(2012ZB032
2013ZA027)
浙江省教育厅科研计划(Y201224449)
浙江省中药现代化专项(浙经信医化[2012]237号)
关键词
等级
杭白芍
儿茶素
芍药内酯苷
芍药苷
grades
Hangzhou white peony
catechin
albiflorin
paeoniflorin
