摘要
法官责任豁免的制度实践首先来自英国,并伴随着司法独立、司法权威的建设而不断完善。法官豁免权的直接目的在于保障法官行使审判权时的独立性,并最终实现公民权益的维护。目前,虽然两大法系国家法官豁免权的界限和范围不尽相同,但均确立了法官的相对豁免权。我国应借鉴法治发达国家的先进经验,在《法官法》中明确肯定法官的豁免权,并合理界定其内容和范围。
The practice of judge immunity system came from the UK, perfecting itself along with the develop- ment of judicial independence and judicial authority. Its direct purpose is to safeguard the independence in tri- al, thereby maintaining citizenslrights and interests. Although boundaries and scope of judge immunity in dif- ferent countries are not the same, they all have established the system. Therefore lessons are to be drawn from the developed countries in order to positively confirm judge immunity and define its content and scope.
出处
《山东师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
2013年第6期127-135,共9页
Journal of Shandong Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"终极控制权
大股东掏空及投资者保护"(112JY149)
中南财经政法大学研究生创新教育计划课题"社会转型期中的遗弃罪研究"(2013B1802)的阶段性成果
关键词
法官豁免
法律要义
相对豁免
法律责任
judge immunity
legal essence
relative immunity
legal responsibility
