期刊文献+

餐后不同时间段膈肌训练对胃食管反流病患者抗反流屏障的影响 被引量:8

Therapeutic mechanism of diaphragm training at different periods in patients with gastroesophagealreflux disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察餐后不同时间段的膈肌训练对胃食管反流病(GERD)患者食管酸暴露、食管动力学和近端胃容积的影响。方法对象为2005年6月至2006年6月于北京协和医院就诊的30例GERD患者和9名健康对照。采用随机数字表将GERD患者随机分为3组:餐后第1小时膈肌训练组(DT1b组)、餐后第2小时膈肌训练组(DT2h组)和餐后不进行膈肌训练组(N-DT组)。DT1h、DT2h、N—DT和健康对照组4组间人口学特征匹配。应用DentSleeve测压导管和pH监测电极,同步观察受试者空腹30min和餐后2h的食管酸暴露和食管动力学参数[下食管括约肌压(LESP)、食管胃结合部(EGJ)压和膈脚压]。测压期间于空腹,餐后0、30、60、90和120min进行超声胃容积测定。结果DT1h组患者餐后2h内食管pH〈4的时间百分比明显低于N.DT组[0.2%(0~4.1%)比6.6%(2.2%-18.2%),P〈0.05],而DT2h组[3.7(0.1%~17.8%)]与N-DT组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。DT,h组患者餐后第1小时的EGJ压和膈脚压均高于N—DT组[(44.4±8.1)比(16.2±4.5)mmHg,(38.2±4.2)比(9.8±4.5)mmHg,1mmHg=0.133kPa,均P〈0.05]。DT2h组患者餐后第2小时的EGJ压和膈脚压也均高于N-DT组[(53.2±7.5)比(14.0±3.7)mmHg,(48.2±6.3)比(8.9±2.7)mmHg,均P〈0.05]。各组LESP和餐后近端胃容积差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。结论试餐后第1小时进行膈肌训练可以有效控制餐后2h的食管酸暴露,其机制可能为EGJ区抗反流屏障的加强。膈肌训练为GERD的保守治疗提供了一种新的治疗手段。 Objective To explore the effects of postprandial diaphragm training (DT) on esophageal acid exposure, esophageal motility and proximal gastric volume at different postprandial periods in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease ( GERD). Methods Thirty GERD patients and 9 healthy subjects (HS) with matched demographic characteristics were enrolled from June 2005 to June 2006 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Esophageal manometry with a Dentsleeve catheter and simultaneous esophageal pH monitoring were recorded in a 30-min fasting period and a 120-min postprandial period. The GERD patients were divided into 3 groups: 9 patients received diaphragm training at 1st hour after meal ( group DT1 h ) and another 10 at 2nd hour after meal ( group DT2 h ) whereas no diaphragm training after meal in 11 (group NDT). Ultrasonic imaging of proximal gastric volume was undertaken at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after meal. Results ( 1 ) The percentage time with pH 〈 4 in group DT1 h was lower than that in group NDT in the 120-min postprandial period (0. 2% (0 -4. 1% ), 6. 6 % (2. 2% - 18. 2% ), P 〈 0.05 ) and no significant difference of esophageal acid exposure was observed between groups DT2 h and NDT (3.7%(0. 1%-17.8%),6.6%(2.2% -18.2%), P〉0.05). (2) Esophagogastricjunction (EGJ) and crural diaphragm pressures at the l't hour after meal in group DT1 h were both significantly higher than those in group NDT during diaphragm training ((44.4±8.1 ) vs (16. 2 ± 4. 5)mm Hg, (38.2± 4. 2 ) vs(9.8 ±4. 5) mm Hg, 1 mm Hg =0. 133 kPa, both P 〈0. 05). EGJ and crural diaphragm pressures at the 2nd hour after meal in group DTz h were significantly higher than those in group N-DT during diaphragm training ( (53.2 -+7.5) vs ( 14. 0 ±3.7) mm Hg, (48.2±6. 3) vs (8.9±2. 7) mm Hg, both P 〈0. 05). There was no change of lower esophageal sphincter pressure ( all P 〉 0. 05 ). ( 3 ) After test meal, the groups D
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第40期3215-3219,共5页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 胃食管反流 食管 食管动力 Gastroesophageal reflux Diaphragm Esophagus Esophageal motility
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献45

共引文献72

同被引文献68

  • 1王其彰.食管胃连接部与食管下括约肌[J].食管外科电子杂志,2013(2):70-81. 被引量:1
  • 2丁召路,王智凤,李鸿斌,孙晓红,许琳,柯美云.胃食管反流病患者胃食管连接部屏障功能的探讨[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(34):2382-2385. 被引量:12
  • 3S. tolone,C. DE cassan, N. DE bortoli, et al. Esophagogastric junetion morphology is associated with a positive impedance-pH monitoring in patients with GERD [J]. Neurogastroenterol Mo- til,2015,27 : 1175-1182. 被引量:1
  • 4Constanza Ciriza-de-los-Rios, et al. How usefuls esophageal high res- olution manometry in diagnosing gastroesophageal junction disrup- tion: Causes affecting this disruption and its relationship with mano-metric alterations and gastroesophageal reflu FJ]. Revista Espafiola de Enfermedades Digestivas ,2014,106(1) ~22-29. 被引量:1
  • 5Pandolfino JE,Kim H,Ghosh SK,etal. High-resolution manom- etry Of the EGJ: an analysis of crural diaphragm function in GERD [J']. Am J Gastroenterol, 2007,102 : 1056-1063. 被引量:1
  • 6Koek G H,Sifrim D, Lerut T, et a l. Multivariate analysis of the association of acid and duodeno-gastro-oesophageal reflux expo- sure with the presence of oesophagitis, the severity of oesophagi- tis and Barrett's oesophagus [J]. Gut,2008,57(8) :1056-1064. 被引量:1
  • 7Kahrilas P J,Kim H C,Pandolfmo J E. Approaches to the diag- nosis and grading of hiatal hernia [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Gas- troenterol, 2008,22(4) :601-616. 被引量:1
  • 8M. A. Kwiatek. Physiology of the LES [J3. Diseases of the E- sophagus, 2012, (25)~ 286-291. 被引量:1
  • 9Weijenhorg PW. Accuracy of hiatal hernia detection with esopha- geal high-resolution manometry l-J3. Neurogastroenterology Motility,2015,27(2) ,293-299. 被引量:1
  • 10Y. S. Khajanchee, M. A. Cassera, L. L. Swanstr6m, et al. C. M. Dunst. Diagnosis of Type-I hiatal hernia: a comparison of high-resolution manometry and endoscopy EJ~. Diseases of the Esophagus,2013, 26, 1-6. 被引量:1

引证文献8

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部