期刊文献+

“针灸只是安慰剂”之质疑——以国内外针灸文献对比研究为讨论基础 被引量:5

Questionings towards notion of “Acupuncture is just a placebo”:using comparative research of literatures on acupuncture both domestic and foreign as discussion basis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨国外SCI源期刊对针灸治疗腰背痛的研究方向,并与国内针灸核心期刊进行对比。通过对比,对"针灸只是安慰剂"之说进行深入探讨与思考。[方法]通过搜集近10年国外SCI源期刊和国内核心期刊所收录的针灸治疗腰背痛的临床研究文献进行统计和分析,探讨国内外研究者对针灸治疗腰背痛的研究方向之差异,从而进一步对"针灸只是安慰剂"之说进行剖析。[结果]国外研究对针灸治疗腰背痛的研究目标设立较为广泛,国内研究则是集中于探索针灸治疗腰背痛的疗效观察与评估。但国外研究中涉及了国内研究中所不见的假针灸对照试验研究。可是,基于假针灸对照组的设立存有争议并且未达到共识",针灸只是安慰剂"之说仍有争议。[结论]国内和国外研究者对针灸治疗腰背痛存在着研究方向上的分歧。"针灸只是安慰剂"之说仍存有争议。 [Objective] To explore the investigation direction in treatment of low back pain with acupuncture and moxibustion published in SCI-sourced journal in abroad and compare it with that presented in domestic core journal. Through comparative research, we have further explored and thought about the notion of "Acupuncture is just a placebo". [Methods] A statistical analysis was conducted on the difference of research direction from the SCI-sourced journals for 10 years in foreign countries and the domestic core journals about lower back pain treated by acupncture. Therefore, further exploration was performed on that "Acupuncture is just a placebo". [Results] The range of study objectives in foreign researches was more extensive, while the domestic researches were focused on exploring the observation and evaluation of therapeutic effect of acupuncture in treating this disease. However, the foreign researches have involved a sham acupuncture controlled studies, which have not seen in the domestic researches. But, as the establishment of a standardized sham acupuncture control group has some arguments and have not reached consensus. The notion of "Acupuncture is just a placebo" was still controversy. [Conclusion] There exists difference in the research objectives of clinical research literatures published in foreign SCI journals and Chinese core domestic journals with regard to the treatment of low back pain by acupuncture. The notion of "Acupuncture is just a placebo" has yet argument.
作者 林香均 李瑞
出处 《天津中医药》 CAS 2013年第10期632-636,共5页 Tianjin Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词 腰背痛 安慰剂 假针灸 国外SCI源期刊 国内核心期刊 对比研究 low back pain placebo sham acupuncture SCI-sourced journal abroad domestic core journal comparative research
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Madsen MV, Gctzsche PC, Hrobjartsson A. Acupuncture treatment for pain: Systematic review of randomised clinical trials with acupunc- ture, placebo acupuncture, and no acupuncture groups [J].BMJ, 2009, 338: 3115-3116. 被引量:1
  • 2Price DD, Finniss DG, Benedetti F. A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: Recent advances and current thought [J]. Annu Rev Psy- chol, 2008, 59:565-590. 被引量:1
  • 3Finniss DG, Kaptchuk TJ, Miller F, et al. Biological, clinical and ethical advances of placebo effects [J]. Lancet, 2010, 375(9715): 686-695. 被引量:1
  • 4Waddell G. The back pain revolution [M]. London: Churchill Living-stone, 1999:234-265. 被引量:1
  • 5Waddell G. The back Pain Revolution[M]. London: Churchill Living- stone, 1999: 234-265. 被引量:1
  • 6HM Government. Government response to the House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology's report on complementary and alternative medicine [M]. London: HMSO, 2001:523-330. 被引量:1
  • 7Ter Riet G, Kleijnen J, Knipschild P. Acupuncture and chronic pain: a criteria-based meta-analysis [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1990, 43(11): 1191 - 1199. 被引量:1
  • 8Ezzo J, Berman B, Hadhazy V, et al. Is acupuncture effective for the treatment of chronic pain? A systematic review [J]. Pain, 2000, 86 (10) :217-215. 被引量:1
  • 9White AR, Ernst E. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for neck pain [J]. Br J Rheumatol, 1999, 38(2) : 143-147. 被引量:1
  • 10Ernst E, White AR. Acupuncture for back pain: a meta-analysis of ran- domized controlled trials[J]. Arch Intern Med, 1998, 158(20): 2235- 2241. 被引量:1

同被引文献71

引证文献5

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部