摘要
通过web of Science,PubMed检索近5年SCI源期刊文献,对其中针灸临床治疗头痛的论文,进行归纳整理及统计分析。结果表明:①国外SCI源期刊针灸治疗头痛临床文献没有依据辨证论治思想进行选穴治疗;②国外SCI源期刊针灸治疗头痛采用假针作对照的临床试验结果均显示针灸疗效与假针疗效无差异。表明因中西医学理论体系及思维方式有较大的差异,西方世界对中医针灸认知程度也尚浅,他们并未掌握中医针灸技术的精髓。国外SCI源期刊针灸治疗头痛临床文献使用假针作对照并不能凸显针灸疗法的优势,而应用假针作对照的试验设计也并不适合针灸疗法。
Retrieving literatures in SCI source journals in the recent 5 years through Web of Science and I＇uhMed databases, articles regarding to the treatment of headache with acupuncture are arranged and analyzed. It turns out that ①the acupoint selection and treatment is not under the guidence of syndrome differentiation in the clinical research literatures published in foreign journals.②The clinical research trials published in foreign journals shows that regarding to curative effect, there is no difference belween acupuncture group and sham acupuncture group which indicats that the westerners do not grasp the essene of acupuncture techniques owing to the great difference of medical theory and thinking mode between eastern and western, and the western＇s shallow cognition of TCM and acupuncture. The sham acupuncture trials published in foreign journals with respect to acupuncture for headache cannot highlight the advantage of acupuncture therapy, what＇s more, the sham acupuncture trial de- signation is unfit for acupuncture therapy.
出处
《中国针灸》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2012年第10期952-956,共5页
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
关键词
头痛
针灸疗法
科学引文索引
综述文献
Headache
Acu-Moxi Therapy
Science Citation Index（SCI）
Review
