期刊文献+

当代美国学前课程评价的发展及启示——以“学前课程评价研究”项目(PCER)为例 被引量:7

On the Development of Contemporary American Preschool Curriculum Evaluation and its Inspiration——Taking Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research(PCER) Program as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自"泰勒原理"确立以来,课程评价成为课程领域的重要课题。当代美国学前课程评价在"两种力量"的冲突和协调中发展。尽管课程评价的"发展取向"具有巨大的影响力,但政府主导的学前课程评价实践的"学业取向"仍然明显,幼儿的"入学准备"水平备受关注。从2002年开始历时近7年的"学前课程评价研究"项目(PCER)就是反映当代美国学前课程评价发展的一个典型实例。 Since "Tyler Rationale" was established,the curriculum evaluation has been an essential research subject in the field of curriculum. The contemporary American preschool curriculum evaluation has been pushed forward by the conflict and coordination of the "two forces". Although the "development orientation" in the curriculum evaluation has a great influence,the "academic orientation" in the curriculum evaluation practices led by the US government is still evident,and young children's "school readiness" has aroused much attention. The Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research (PCER) ,which lasted from 2002 to 2009,is a typical case representing the development of the contemporary preschool curriculum evaluation in America.
作者 黄书生
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第10期77-86,共10页 Studies in Foreign Education
关键词 美国 学前课程评价 PCER 入学准备 America preschool curriculum evaluation PCEIk school readiness
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1虞永平等著..幼儿园课程评价[M].南京:江苏教育出版社,2009:218.
  • 2张华著..课程与教学论[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2000:485.
  • 3CarolCopple & Sue Bredekamp. Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early ChildhoodPrograms Serving Children from Birth through Age 8 (Third Edition) [M]. Washington,DC: The Nation-al Association for the Education of the Young Children, 2009.21-22. 被引量:1
  • 4OralieMcAfee & Deborah,J. Leong. Assessing and Guiding Young Children's Developmentand Learning [ M ].Boston : Allyn & Bacon, 2002.103. 被引量:1
  • 5Katz,L..Program Content and Implementation [ A ]. D. Cryer & R. Clifford (Eds.). Early Child-hood Education and Care in the USA[C]. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing,2003.107-118. 被引量:1
  • 6孙贺群,王小英.嬗变与走向:美国学前课程的历史转型及启示[J].外国教育研究,2011,38(1):51-56. 被引量:1
  • 7洪松舟.美国高风险标准化测验与教育公平[J].教育发展研究,2008,28(2):57-59. 被引量:4
  • 8ZillNicholas, Resnick Gary & Kim Kwang, et al.. Head Start FACES 2000: A Whole -ChildPerspective on Program Performance [R]. Alexandria: Head Start Information and Publication Center,2003. 2. 被引量:1
  • 9杨佳.从开端计划到NCLB:弱势儿童教育制度的发展[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2010,9(4):10-14. 被引量:9
  • 10Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research Consortium. Effects ofPreschool Curriculum Programs on School Readiness (NCER 2008-2009),U.S. Department of Education[EB/OL ]. http : //ies.ed.gov/ncer/pubs/20082009/index.asp,2013-01-12. 被引量:1

二级参考文献31

  • 1傅林.美国21世纪教育改革蓝图NCLB述评[J].当代教育科学,2006(15):39-40. 被引量:1
  • 2陈奎.教育社会学研究[M].台北:师大书苑出版社.1995. 被引量:1
  • 3J.Coleman.The Concept of Equality of Educational Opportunity [ EB/OL ].http://www.eric.ed.gov/ ERICWebPortal/ custom/portlets/recordDetails/2010-05-10. 被引量:1
  • 4Benjamin Bloom.Stability and Change in Human Characteristics [M].New York:John Wiley & Sons, 1964. 被引量:1
  • 5Samuel Braun,Esther Edwards.History and Theory of Early Childhood Education [ M ].Worthington, Ohio : A. Jones Publishing Company, 1972. 被引量:1
  • 6Head Start [ EB/OL ].http://en.wikip.edia.org/wiki/Head_Start/2009-07-23. 被引量:1
  • 7Head Start Program Fact Sheet[EB/OL].http://www.acf. hhs. gov/programs/ohs/about/ fy2007.htm). 被引量:1
  • 8国家教育发展研究中心组.发达国家教育改革的动向和趋势(第七集)(国家教育发展研究中心组译)[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2004. 被引量:1
  • 9No Child Left Behind Act[EB/OL].http://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/ NoChild_Left Behind Act/ 2010-05-10. 被引量:1
  • 10No Child Lett Behind Act Is Working [EB/OL].http: //www2.ed.gov/nclb/overview/importance/nclbworking.html/2010-05-2. 被引量:1

共引文献11

同被引文献41

引证文献7

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部