期刊文献+

经颅直流电刺激右侧颞顶联合区对道德意图加工的影响 被引量:11

Exciting the Right Temporo-Parietal Junction with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Influences Moral Intention Processing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对行为意图的理解是人类进行道德判断的重要依据,大量研究表明,右侧颞顶联合区是意图加工的关键脑区。为考察该脑区在道德判断中的重要作用,采用经颅直流电刺激技术阳极刺激右侧颞顶联合区,探讨促进该脑区的活动对被试在道德判断中意图及相关信息加工的影响。结果发现与假刺激条件相比,阳极刺激后道德判断反应时显著延长,在伤人未遂和意外伤人条件下差异显著,证明促进右侧颞顶联合区的激活能影响道德判断中的意图加工,尤其在意图与结果产生冲突的条件下效应更加显著。 When we evaluate the moral status of an action,we consider not only its consequences but also the beliefs and intentions of the actor,which relies on the capacity to infer others' mental states.Functional MRI studies showed that the right temporo-parietal junction(RTPJ) is the critical brain region for understanding others' mental states.Previous studies have found that the role of intention processing in moral judgment was reduced by disrupting the RTPJ with transcranial magnetic stimulation(TMS).In the current study,we enhanced the role of intention processing in moral judgment with the transcranial direct current sitmulation(tDCS),a painless,non-invasive brain stimulation technique that allows us to induce polarity-specific excitability changes in the human brain.Many tDCS studies have confirmed the anodal excitation effect for cognitive functions.However,so far,limited work has been done to explore the tDCS effect on social cognitive function such as moral judgment.Therefore,the present study aims to investigate the anodal excitation effect of tDCS on moral judgment.We hypothesize that exciting the neural activity of RTPJ with anodal tDCS could enhance the role of intention processing in moral judgment.To test our hypothesis,18 healthy college students were recruited to participate in the study.All subjects underwent two tDCS sessions(anodal and sham tDCS) in random order and counterbalanced across subjects on 2 separate days with 1 week interval between both stimulations.We applied anodal(1.5mA,20 min) and sham tDCS(1.5mA,15 sec) on the RTPJ while subjects were introduced to keep a resting state.After stimulation,subjects read stories in a 2(intention: negative vs.neutral) × 2(outcome: negative vs.neutral) design and were asked to make moral judgment about how much blame the actor deserves.We analyzed the moral evaluation score and reaction time by a 2(intention) × 2(outcome) × 2(tDCS: anodal,sham) repeated measures ANOVA.Results showed that actors wit
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第9期1004-1014,共11页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金重大研究计划培育项目(91132704) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(31170971) 国家自然科学基金重大国际合作项目(61210010)资助 国家973计划项目(2011CB711000 2013CB837300) 国家社科基金重大项目(12&ZD228)
关键词 道德判断 意图 结果 右侧颞顶联合区 经颅直流电刺激 moral judgment intention consequence right temporo-parietal junction(RTPJ) transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献38

  • 1Borg, S. J., Lieberman, D., & Kiehl, K. A. (2008). Infection, incest, and iniquity: Investigating the neural correlates of disgust and morality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(9), 1529-1546. 被引量:1
  • 2Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S, Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652. 被引量:1
  • 3Bucciarelli, M., Khemlani, S., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2008). The psychology of moral reasoning. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 121-139. 被引量:1
  • 4Chandler, M. J., Sokol, B. W., & Wainryb, C. (2000). Beliefs about truth and beliefs about rightness. Child Development, 71, 91-97. 被引量:1
  • 5Chapman, H. A., Kim, D. A., Susskind, J. M., & Anderson, A. K. (2009). In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science, 323(5918), 1222-1226. 被引量:1
  • 6Eskine, K. J., Kacinik, N. A., & Prinz, J. J. (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22(3), 295-299. 被引量:1
  • 7Finkel, N. J., Liss, M. B., & Moran, V. R. (1997). Equal or proportional justice for accessories? Children's pearls of proportionate wisdom. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 18, 229-244. 被引量:1
  • 8Greene, J. D. (2007). The secret joke of Kant's soul. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.). Moral psychology, Vol. 3: Theneuroscience of morality: Emotion, disease, and development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 被引量:1
  • 9Greene, J. D., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 517-523. 被引量:1
  • 10Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107, 1144-1154. 被引量:1

共引文献24

同被引文献95

引证文献11

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部