期刊文献+

新老法律现实主义司法直觉的嬗变 被引量:2

The Evolution of Judicial Intuition of Old and New Legal Realism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪二三十年代,法律现实主义借助当时的心理学理论对法律形式主义发起了猛烈的攻击,指出司法主要是直觉而非推理,促使人们认识到了法律形式主义的不足。但由于当时心理学理论学派林立,派别之间还存在不少矛盾,致使法律现实主义出现了根基性的缺陷。后来,认知心理学的出现与发展,超越了以往心理学理论派别的论争与冲突,为法律现实主义的勃兴提供了助力。 During 1920s and 1930s, legal realism criticized legal formalism fiercely by means of psychological theories, pointing out that judiciary was to a great extent intuitive rather than reasoning, which made people realize the weakness of judiciary. However, due to a variety of schools in psychological theory and many conflicts among them, it is inevitable to have fundamen-tal defects of legal realism.The emergence and development of cognitive psychology which is beyond the debates and conflicts of previous psychological theories contributes to the prosperity of legal realism.
作者 李安
出处 《杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期121-125,共5页 Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词 法律现实主义 司法直觉 认知心理学 Legal realism judicial intuition cognitive psychology
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Michael Steven Green. Legal Realism as Theory of Law [ J ]. William and Mary Law Review,2005,46(6) :1917 -1966. 被引量:1
  • 2Victoria Nourse, Gregory Shaffer. Varieties of New Legal Real- ism: Can a New World Order Prompt a New legal Theory? [ J]. Cornell Law Review ,2009,95 (61) :63 -136. 被引量:1
  • 3Charles L. Barzun. Jerome Frank and the Modem Mind[J]. Uni- versity of Virginia School of Law : Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper series ,2009, (01) : 1 - 44. 被引量:1
  • 4Nell Duxbury. Jerome Frank and the legacy of legal Realism[ J]. Journal of Law and Society, 1991,18 ( 2 ) : 175 - 204. 被引量:1
  • 5于晓艺.“基本法律神话”的破灭——评《法与现代心智》[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2007,25(1):165-168. 被引量:4
  • 6J. H. Wigmore, Professor Munsterberg and Psychology of testimony :Being a report of the case of Cokestone v. Munsterberg [ J ]. Illinois i Law Revlew,1909,3(7).399 -445. 被引量:1
  • 7Thomas J. Miles, Cass R. Sunstein. The New legal Realism[ J] The University of Chicago Lw Review, 2008,75 ( 2 ). 831 - 851. 被引量:1
  • 8Howard Erlanger, Bryant Garth, Jane Iarson, Elizabeth Mertz, Victoria Nourse, David Wilkins. Is It Time for a New Legal Realism? [J]. W/s- consin law Review ,2ig05,75( 2 ) :335 -363. 被引量:1
  • 9周治金,赵晓川,刘昌.直觉研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(6):745-751. 被引量:34
  • 10Amy L. Baylor. A Three-Component Conception of Intuition: Immediaey, Sensing Relationships, And Reason[ J]. New Ideas Psychol,1997,15(2). 185 - 194. 被引量:1

二级参考文献50

  • 1Borg, S. J., Lieberman, D., & Kiehl, K. A. (2008). Infection, incest, and iniquity: Investigating the neural correlates of disgust and morality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(9), 1529-1546. 被引量:1
  • 2Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S, Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652. 被引量:1
  • 3Bucciarelli, M., Khemlani, S., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2008). The psychology of moral reasoning. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 121-139. 被引量:1
  • 4Chandler, M. J., Sokol, B. W., & Wainryb, C. (2000). Beliefs about truth and beliefs about rightness. Child Development, 71, 91-97. 被引量:1
  • 5Chapman, H. A., Kim, D. A., Susskind, J. M., & Anderson, A. K. (2009). In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science, 323(5918), 1222-1226. 被引量:1
  • 6Eskine, K. J., Kacinik, N. A., & Prinz, J. J. (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22(3), 295-299. 被引量:1
  • 7Finkel, N. J., Liss, M. B., & Moran, V. R. (1997). Equal or proportional justice for accessories? Children's pearls of proportionate wisdom. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 18, 229-244. 被引量:1
  • 8Greene, J. D. (2007). The secret joke of Kant's soul. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.). Moral psychology, Vol. 3: Theneuroscience of morality: Emotion, disease, and development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 被引量:1
  • 9Greene, J. D., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 517-523. 被引量:1
  • 10Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107, 1144-1154. 被引量:1

共引文献65

同被引文献5

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部