期刊文献+

全日制硕士专业学位研究生专业能力与职业技能协同培养研究 被引量:44

Study of Integrated Training of Academic Abilities and Occupational Skills for Full-time Professional Master's Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 全日制硕士专业学位研究生培养要兼顾专业能力与职业技能,其协同培养面临着教学安排的冲突、职业经验的缺失、实践平台的不足等困难。专业能力与职业技能协同培养要坚持以职业实践能力为核心,达成深度与广度的动态平衡,聚焦于良好合作的长效机制,做到学术指导与实践指导相互配合、理论课程与实践课程统筹兼顾、校内培养与校外实践相辅相成。 In spite of difficulties in instruction and shortages in professional experience and practice platforms, the training of full-time professional master's students should offer both academic abilities and occupational skills. Integrated training should be aimed at hands-on professional capacity with a dynamic balance of breadth and depth of training and a long-term mechanism of cooperation. To achieve the above, academic guidance should be integrated with supervised practice, theoretical studies with praeticum courses, and school training with outside practice.
作者 廖湘阳
机构地区 湘潭大学商学院
出处 《研究生教育研究》 CSSCI 2013年第5期74-79,共6页 Journal of Graduate Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究项目"全日制硕士专业学位社会认同度提升对策研究"(项目编号:10YJA880076)的阶段性成果
关键词 全日制硕士专业学位研究生 专业能力 职业技能 协同培养 full-time professional master's student academic ability occupational skill integrated training
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献29

  • 1丁相顺.日本法科大学院教育制度及其特征[J].法制与社会发展,2006,12(3):99-104. 被引量:19
  • 2辛崇阳.日本“法科大学院”设立后的法学教育制度浅析[J].外国教育研究,2007,34(5):64-67. 被引量:8
  • 3Association of American Universities[R]. AAU Committee on graduate education: report and recommendations. Washington DC, 1998. 被引量:1
  • 4Council of Graduate Schools [R]. Graduate education: the backbone of American competitiveness and innovation. Washington DC, 2007. 被引量:1
  • 5CRANTON P A, LEGGE L H. Program evaluation in higher education [J]. The Journal of Higher Education, 1978 (49): 464-471. 被引量:1
  • 6GARDNER D E. Five evaluation frameworks: implications for decision making in higher education [J]. The Journal of Higher Education, 1977 (48): 571-593. 被引量:1
  • 7GOLDBERGER M L, MAHER B A, FLATFA P E. Research-doctorate programs in the United States: continuity and change [M]. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1995. 被引量:1
  • 8MAKI P L, BORKOWSKI N A. The assessment of doctoral education: emerging criteria and new models for improving outcomes [M]. Sterling : Stylus Publishing, 2006. 被引量:1
  • 9NERAD M. The PhD in the US: criticisms, facts, and remedies [J]. Higher Education Policy, 2004 (17): 183-199. 被引量:1
  • 10OSTRIKER J P, KUH C V. Assessing research-doctorate programs: a methodology study [M]. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2003. 被引量:1

共引文献380

同被引文献281

引证文献44

二级引证文献237

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部