期刊文献+

行业周期、两类代理冲突与研发费用投入——来自企业和行业层面的证据 被引量:5

Industry Cycle,Two Types of Agency Conflicts and R & D Investment——Evidence From the Enterprise and Industry levels
下载PDF
导出
摘要 不同行业间研发费用投入具有显著差异,不同行业发展阶段下投资机会和现金流量产生的两类代理冲突对研发费用投入具有重要效应。实证研究发现:(1)越是成长期行业,代理冲突越小,研发费用投入越大。越是成熟期和衰退期行业,代理冲突越大,研发费用投入越小。控制权和现金流权分离度越小、股权制衡度越强、管理层持股比例越高,代理冲突越小,研发费用投入越大。(2)相比于成熟期和成长期行业,衰退期行业中国有产权缓解了其与研发费用投入的负效应。(3)产权性质和市场化进程下两权分离度、股权制衡与管理层持股对研发费用投入产生了异质效应。此发现有助于深入理解研发费用投入强度的行业因素以及特殊环境下代理冲突引起的经济后果。 The industry difference of R & D is significant,the two types of agency conflicts investment opportunities and cash flows generated by different industries have an important effect on investment in R & D expenses.This paper finds that:(1) The smaller agency conflict is the greater R & D is in growing industry.The greater Agency conflict is the smaller R & D is in maturity and fading industry.Agency conflict is greater and R & D is smaller when separation of control rights and cash flow rights is greater.Agency conflict is smaller and R & D is greater when managerial ownership is greater.(2) Compared to the mature and growing,the state-owned property eases the negative effects in recession industry.(3) The separation of ownership and management holdings effect on R & D.This discovery provides better understanding in industry factors and economic consequences of agency conflicts.
作者 梅波
出处 《财经论丛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期73-80,共8页 Collected Essays on Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71262006) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目(12YJC790141 10YJC790279)
关键词 行业周期 制度环境 代理冲突 研发费用投入 industry cycle institutional environment agency conflict R & D investment
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Hanel, P. and A. St-Pierre. Effects of R & D spillovers on the profitability of firms [ J]. Review of Industrial Organization, 2002, 20 (4): 305-322. 被引量:1
  • 2Kraft, K. Market structure, firm characteristics and innovative activity [ J]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1989, (37) : 329 - 336. 被引量:1
  • 3Blundell, R. , Griffith, R. , Van Reenen, J. Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms [J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1999, (66) : 529 -554. 被引量:1
  • 4Hashmi Aamir Rafique. Competition and Innovation The Inverted-U Relationship Revisited, Working Paper, 2011. 被引量:1
  • 5Geroski, P. A. Innovation, Technological Opportunity, and Market Structure. Oxford Economic Papers, 1990, (42) : 586 -602. 被引量:1
  • 6Harris, M. N. , Rogers, M. , Siouclis, A. Modelling firm innovation using panel probit estimators [J]. Applied Economics Letters, 2003, 10(11): 683 -686. 被引量:1
  • 7Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, Griffith, R., Howitt, P. Competition and Innovation: an inverted U-relationship [J]. Quar- terly Journal of Economics, 2005, (120) : 701 -728. 被引量:1
  • 8Joaquln Art6s. Long-run versus short-run decisions [ J]. Research Policy, 2009, (38) : 120 -132. 被引量:1
  • 9Franeis, J. Smith, A. Agency costs and innovation [ J]. Journal of Accounting and Economies, 1995, (19) : 383 -409. 被引量:1
  • 10Bushee, B. J. The influence of institutional investors onmyopic R&D investment behavior [ J]. Accounting Review, 1998, (73): 305 - 333. D. 被引量:1

二级参考文献197

共引文献1433

同被引文献105

二级引证文献115

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部