期刊文献+

病理N3期胃癌310例预后分析 被引量:2

Prognosis analysis of 310 patients with pathological stage pN3 gastric cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨UICC第7版TNM分期标准中病理N3(pN3)期胃癌患者的预后特征及预后影响因素。方法回顾性分析2000年1月至2006年12月间天津医科大学附属肿瘤医院收治的实施胃癌根治术或扩大根治术的310例pN3期胃癌患者的临床病理和随访资料,分别采用Logrank检验和Cox比例风险模型进行单因素和多因素预后分析。结果310例患者均获随访,随访时间为2~103(平均35.7)月,术后5年生存率为14.6%。其中pN3a期201例,pN3b期109例,5年生存率分别为16.8%和10.3%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.013)。单因素预后分析显示,肿瘤部位、Borrmann分型、pT分期、pN分期、淋巴结转移率及手术方式与患者预后有关(均P〈0.05)。多因素分析显示,浸润深度、手术方式及淋巴结转移率是影响预后的独立危险因素(均P〈0.01),而pN分期并不是独立的预后影响因素(P=0.658)。按浸润深度对患者进行分层分析显示,对于210例pT4a期患者,pN3a和pN3b亚组5年生存率分别为16.1%和12.8%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.001);但对于88例pT4b期患者,pN3a和pN,b亚组5年生存率的差异则无统计学意义(8.6%比3.1%,P=0.137)。结论pM期胃癌患者预后较差,肿瘤浸润深度和不同手术方式是影响其预后的重要因素,淋巴结转移率对判断pM期胃癌预后有重要意义。第7版TNM分期中pN3分期能较好反映患者的预后情况。 Objective To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with pathological stage pN3 gastric cancer. Methods A retrospective study of 310 patients with histologically confirmed pN3 stage gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy from January 2000 to December 2006 in our department was performed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the survival. Log-rank test and Cox regression model were carried out for univariate and multivariate analyses. Results All the patients were followed up for 2 to 103 (mean 35.7) months. The overall 5-year survival rate was 14.6%. There were 201 cases with stage pN3a and 109 cases with stage pN3b, and the 5-year survival rates were 16.8% and 10.3% respectively(P=0.013). Univariate analysis showed that tumor location, Borrmann type, depth of tumor invasion, surgical method, metastatic lymph node ratio, and pN stage were associated with postoperative survival (all P〈0.05). The multivariate analysis revealed that depth of tumor invasion, surgical method and metastatic lymph node ratio were independent prognostic factors, while the pN stage was not. The difference of 5-year survival rate between pN3a and pN3b subgroups was significant in pT4a patients(16.1% vs. 12.8%, P=0.001), while such difference was not significant in pT4b patients (8.6% vs. 3.1%, P=0.137). Conclusions Prognosis of patients with pN3 stage gastric cancer after radical resection is poor. Depth of tumor invasion and surgical method are independent prognostic factors for pN3 stage gastric cancer. Metastatic lymph node ratio is valuable to predict the prognosis of pN3 stage patients. The pN3 staging of the 7th UICC provides a more accurate prediction of prognosis.
出处 《中华胃肠外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 2013年第6期543-546,共4页 Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2010CB529301)
关键词 胃肿瘤 肿瘤分期 淋巴结分期 预后 Stomach neoplasms Neoplasm staging Lymph node stage Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Zhang M, Li Z, Ma Y, et al. with carcinoma of the gastric 2012,59 : 930-933. 被引量:1
  • 2Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz Prognostic predictors of patients cardia. Hepatogastroenterology, MK, Wittekind CH. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 7th ed. International Union Against Cancer(UICC). New York : Wiley-Liss, 2010. 被引量:1
  • 3Sobin LH, Wittekind CH. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 6th ed. International Union Against Cancer (UICC). New York : Wiley-Liss, 2002. S. 被引量:1
  • 4obin LH, Wittekind CH. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 5th ed. International Union Against Cancer(UICC). New York : Wiley-Liss, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 5Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Hahn S, et al. Evaluation of the seventh American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Classification of gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with the sixth classification. Cancer, 2010,116: 5592-5598. 被引量:1
  • 6Deng J, Liaug H, Sun D, et al. Suitability of 7th UICC N stage for predicting the overall survival of gastric cancer patients after curative resection in China. Ann Surg Oncol, 2010.17 : 1259-1266. 被引量:1
  • 7潘源,梁寒,薛强,张汝鹏,崔青皓,刘宁,王宝贵.国际抗癌联盟和日本胃癌协会胃癌淋巴结分期法与国人胃癌患者预后相关性的比较[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2008,30(5):376-380. 被引量:23
  • 8梁寒,薛强,张汝鹏,郝希山.胃癌D2根治术淋巴结切除数目与预后的关系[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2007,10(6):528-530. 被引量:20
  • 9阿拉腾宝力德,李医明,刘彩刚,王斌斌,徐惠绵,陈峻青,王舒宝,路平.淋巴结转移率对胃癌患者预后的评估价值[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2012,15(2):137-140. 被引量:18
  • 10Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A, et al. The ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N Ratio) is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer regardless of the type of Lymphadenectomy: results from an Italian muhicentric study in 1853 patients. Ann Surg, 2007,245:543-552. 被引量:1

二级参考文献33

  • 1Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma, 2nd English Edition. Gastric Cancer, 1998, 1:10- 24. 被引量:1
  • 2Sobin LH, Fleming ID. TNM classification of malignant tumors , fifth edition( 1997 ). Union Intemationale Contre le Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Cancer, 1997, 80: 1803- 1804. 被引量:1
  • 3Katai H, Yoshimura K, Maruyama K, et al. Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma. Cancer, 2000, 88:1796-1800. 被引量:1
  • 4Roder JD, Bottcher K, Busch R, et al. Classification of regional lymph node matastasis from gastric carcinoma. German Gastric Cancer Study Group. Cancer, 1998, 82:621-631. 被引量:1
  • 5Yoo CH, Nob SH, Kim YI, et al. Comparison prognostic significance of nodal staging between old (4^th edition) and new (5^th edition) UICC TNM classification for gastric carcinoma. International Union Against Cancer. World J Surg, 1999, 23:492-497. 被引量:1
  • 6Ikeguchi M, Murakami D, Kanaji S, et al. Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer: comparison of Union International Contra Cancer and Japanese systems. ANZ J Surg, 2004, 74:852-854. 被引量:1
  • 7Aurello P, D'Angelo F, Rossi S, et al. Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature. Am Surg, 2007, 73:359-366. 被引量:1
  • 8Karpeh MS, Leon L, Klimstra D, et al. Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than number? An analysis of 1038 patients. Ann Surg, 2000, 232:362-371. 被引量:1
  • 9Cunningham JM, Kimmel DW, Scheithauer BW,et al. Analysis of proliferation markers and p53 expression in gliomas of astrocytic origin: relationships and prognostic value [ J ]. J Neurosurg, 1997, 86:121 - 130. 被引量:2
  • 10Camby I, Lefranc F, Titeca G,et al. Differential expression of S100 calcium-binding proteins characterizes distinct clinical entities in both WHO grade Ⅱ and Ⅲ astrocytic tumours[ J]. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol, 2000, 26 ( 1 ): 76 - 90. 被引量:2

共引文献54

同被引文献26

  • 1王晓娜,丁学伟,张李,张晖,刘宁,张汝鹏,梁寒.淋巴结外软组织阳性胃癌预后相关分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2007,10(5):436-439. 被引量:16
  • 2Parkin I)M, Ferlay J, Curado MP, et al. Fifty years of cancer incidence: CI5 I-IX[J]. Int J Cancer, 2010,127(12) :2918-2927. 被引量:1
  • 3Del Rio P, Dell'Abate P, Soliani P, et al. Old and New TNM in carcinoma of the gastric antrum: analysis of our personal experience [ J ]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2003,7 ( 7 ) : 912-916. 被引量:1
  • 4D' Ugo D, Pacelli F, Persiani R, et al. Impact of the latest TNM classification for gastric cancer: retrospective analysis on 94 D2 gastrectomies [J]. World J Surg, 2002,26 (6) : 672-677. 被引量:1
  • 5Kim JP, Kim YW, Yang HK, et at. Significant prognostic factors by multivariate analysis of 3926 gastric cancer patients [J] .World JSurg, 1994,18(6) :872-878. 被引量:1
  • 6Sobin LH, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumors [M]. 7th ed. New York: John Wiley&Sons, 2009:73-77. 被引量:1
  • 7Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma-2nd English Edition[J]. Gastric Cancer, 1998, 1(1) : 10-24. 被引量:1
  • 8Jun KH, Lee JS, Kim JH, et al. The rationality of N3 classification in the 7th edition of the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinomas: a case-control study [ J ]. Int J Surg, 2014,12 (9) : 893-896. 被引量:1
  • 9Fang WL, Huang KH, Chen JH, et al. Comparison of the survival difference between AJCC 6th and 7th editions for gastric cancer patients [J]. World J Surg, 2011,35 (12) : 2723- 2729. 被引量:1
  • 10Deng J, Eiang H, Sun D, et al. Suitability of 7th UICC N stage for predicting the overall survival of gastric cancer patients after curative resection in China [J ]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2010,17(5) : 1259-1266. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部