摘要
关凯认为从文化的角度反思"边疆"概念,分析这一概念在当下语境中的文化指向及其意义,可以揭示其所包含的指涉民族国家建设工程的政治意涵。纳日碧力戈认为萨满巫觋可在意象中超越"中土"的盈缩,也可在隐喻中打造公民和谐、人群团结的共同"语法",重构勾连南北中国的意识形态根基。王东杰认为中国又并非一个完全自足和封闭的叙述单位,其内部的诸多历史现象,必须采用多个文明视域以观察中国史。韦兵认为历史上天下的"弹性"兼容多维度、多层面的表达和实践,既包括把众多族群绾合在一起的"一",也有保留相对独立的"多",提供给夷、夏互动极其宽裕的回旋余地。天下的夷狄一维,使中国能实现连续性的"广土众民",这是一种完整的中国历史经验。黄达远认为可以通过天山这一历史"主轴",可以重新认识以天山为背景的各种事件,从其中的"变"与"不变",理解新疆史及其演变。
Guan Kai holds that in order to reveal political implications of 'borderland' on modern nation-state building,it is necessary to rethink the concept from a culture study perspective as well as to make analysis of its cultural orientation and meanings.Naran Bilik argues that the metaphorical image of Shamans can surpass the conceptual limitations of 'Central Land',and it can help build a common 'grammar' that governs harmony and solidarity among citizens and communities rebuild an ideological basis that links the south and the north China.Wang Dongjie argues that China is not a completely self-consistent and closed unit of narrative considering its internally diversified histories;multi-civilizational perspectives should be employed to observe Chinese history.According to Wei Bing,the worldview of TianXia(天下) was flexible and inclusive of multi-dimensional expressions and practices;has eventually provided a very spacious room for interactions between 'Yi'(夷) and 'Xia'(3E).Huang Dayuan argues that the Tianshan Mountain should be the 'principal axis' of history for understanding Xinjiang and its historical profile of evolution,it helps us understand Xinjiang and its historical evolution according to continuity and change of political configuration in the region.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第6期153-158,164,共6页
Academic Monthly
