摘要
我国《反垄断法》第55条有其特定的立法背景和意图,表明了该法在知识产权领域实施的基本原则和立场,但是它的功能是宣示性和说明性的,并不是认定特定知识产权行使行为是否构成垄断行为的直接依据。对"滥用知识产权"要从一般意义上去理解,而不能自觉或者不自觉地按照某些国家判例法上的特定含义去理解。滥用知识产权不一定构成垄断行为,但构成垄断行为的行使知识产权行为则一定是滥用知识产权。在制定我国知识产权领域的反垄断执法指南时,应处理好借鉴国外经验与立足我国当前实际的关系以及原则性与可操作性之间的关系。
Established with specific legislative background and purpose,article 55 of China’s Antimonopoly Law makes clear the basic principle and standpoint of the application of the Law in the area of Intellectual Property Rights(IPRs).Its role is,nevertheless,declaratory and illustrative,and the validity of an exercise of IPRs is not judged directly according to it.The 'abuse of IPRs' should be understood by the general meaning rather than,consciously and subconsciously,by the specific meaning of case law of some countries.Abusing IPRs is not necessarily monopolistic behavior,but monopolistic behavior involving IPRs is certainly an abuse.When formulating the enforcement guidelines on antimonopoly law in the area of IPRs,what must be well-balanced is the relationship between drawing lessons from foreign experience and being based on the reality of China,and between principle and operation as well.
出处
《南京大学学报（哲学．人文科学．社会科学）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第1期34-43,159,共10页
Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金
国家工商总局委托研究项目
上海市曙光跟踪项目(08GG06)
