摘要
中国《反垄断法》第55条乃协调知识产权法与反垄断法间冲突之外部体系的核心。第55条虽具除外条款之外观,但不应被解释为限制性法条;而应被解释为说明性法条,是关于不违反反垄断法之知识产权行使与违反反垄断法之知识产权行使的类型描述。第55条并无构成要件;处理个案的实体性问题时,不应直接适用第55条,而是应适用反垄断法的其他规定认定某知识产权行使的违法性。第55条明确了衡平两法的理念,并将此衡平任务授权给反垄断执行机构。
Article 55 of China Antimonopoly Law is the core of conflict between IPR and AML. Although Article 55 looks like external system which deals with the the exceptional act, it should not be interpreted as the restricted act, but the explanatory act which underlies the IPR practice should be divided as the legal one and illegal one from the perspective of AML. Article 55 contents no constitu- tive？ requirements, and it can not be applied directly to make the judgment on the lawfulness of one specific IPR practice, which should be judged directly by the general acts of AML. Article 55 under- lies the ideal of equity related to the conflict between IPR and AML, and claims that the AML agency should assume the duty on the implementation of such equity.
出处
《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》
CAS
2012年第5期54-58,共5页
Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）
关键词
知识产权
反垄断规制
限制性法条
说明性法条
intellectual property right
antimonopoly regulating
restricted act
explanatory act
