期刊文献+

动力学视角下的冲突解决策略 被引量:2

A Dynamic Perspective on Conflict Resolution Strategies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统的冲突解决策略是基于问题解决模型,它着眼于各方的利益关系和沟通、控制等因素在解决冲突中的作用;动力学系统模型主要从推动冲突的吸引子出发,探讨冲突演化的过程。动力学的观点认为,冲突解决的关键在于改变系统内在的动力学性质,即引发和决定冲突演化趋向的吸引子,冲突的解决策略则主要从打破系统的封闭性、改变系统的反馈环路、恢复系统的多维性、创造和激活潜在的正性吸引子等方面入手。冲突解决的最终目的是使冲突各方形成新的心理和行为模式和不同于以往的心理和社会环境。 Traditional conflict resolution strategy is based on a problem-solving model which focuses on the role played by such factors in conflict resolution as the interest relations, communication and con- trol between different parties. Unlike the problem-solving model, the dynamic system model highlights the role played by the attractor which promotes the escalation of conflict, and explores the evolutionary process of a conflict. From the dynamic perspective, the key to conflict resolution consists in changing the inherent dynamical nature of a conflict system, which means changing the attractor that initiates and determines the evolution of a conflict in time. breaking The dynamic conflict resolution strategies involve up the closed system of a conflict, changing its feedback loops, restoring the multidimensionality of its system and creating and activating the latent attractors. The ultimate aims of conflict resolution are to form a new mental and behavior pattern along with a different psychological and social environment.
作者 李小平
出处 《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期105-111,共7页 Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(10YJA840019) 江苏省社会科学基金项目(10SHB003)
关键词 冲突 动力学 吸引子 冲突解决策略 conflict dynamics attractor conflict resolution strategies
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1李小平.从动力学的观点看冲突和冲突的干预[J].江苏社会科学,2011(2):15-21. 被引量:7
  • 2武杰.跨学科研究与非线性思维[M]{H}北京:中国社会科学出版社,2004. 被引量:1
  • 3魏诺.非线性科学基础与应用[M]{H}北京:科学出版社,2004. 被引量:1
  • 4张卫.当代西方社会冲突理论的形成及发展[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2007(5):117-121. 被引量:33
  • 5Coleman,P. T. Characteristics of protracted,intractable conflict:Towards the development of a meta-framework -I[J].Journal of Peace Psychology,2003.137. 被引量:1
  • 6Coleman,P. T,R. R. Vallacher,A. Nowak,L.Bui-Wrzosinska. Intractable conflict as an attractor:A dynamical systems approach to conflict escalation and intractability[J].{H}AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST,2007.14541475. 被引量:1
  • 7Coleman,P. T. Conflict,complexity,and change:A meta-framework for addressing protracted,intracta-ble conflicts-III[J].Journal of Peace and Psychology,2006.325348. 被引量:1
  • 8Coleman,P. T,L. Bui-Wrzosinska,R. Vallacher,A.Nowak. Protracted conflicts as dynamical sys-tems[A].Chicago,IL:American Bar Associa-tion,2006.6174. 被引量:1
  • 9Coleman,P. T,A. Bartoli,C. Chung,R.Nets M.Gelfand. Surveying attractor landscapes for con-flict:Investigating the relationship between conflict,culture and complexity[A].{H}Kyoto,Japan,2009. 被引量:1
  • 10Deutsch,M. Social psychologys contributions to the study of conflict resolution[J].Negotiation Journal,2002.307320. 被引量:1

二级参考文献42

  • 1杜晓燕.基于反应时范式的内隐态度测量及其方法学思考[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,37(S1):155-157. 被引量:2
  • 2包仕国.和谐社会构建与西方社会冲突理论[J].学术论坛,2006,29(4):69-72. 被引量:15
  • 3http.//attractorsoft-ware.org. 被引量:1
  • 4Tutorial Attractor Software, http./Iwww.iccc.edu.pllas/2as.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 5韦德里希、哈格原.《定量社会学》,郭治安等编译,[成都]四川人民出版社1986年版,第53-108页. 被引量:1
  • 6Baston, C.D., & Ahmad, N., (2001). Empathy-induced al- truism in a prisoner's dilemma II . What if the target of empathy has defected? European Journal of Social Psychology, 31,25-36. 被引量:1
  • 7Coleman, P.T. (2000). Intractable conflict. In M. Deutsch & P.T. Coleman(Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution. Theory and practices. San Francisco. Jossey-Bass. 被引量:1
  • 8Coleman, P.T. (2003). Characteristics of protracted, in- tractable conflict. Towards the development of a meta-framework-- I, Journal of Peace Psychology,9(1), 1-37. 被引量:1
  • 9Coleman, P.T. (2004). Paradigmatic framing of protracted, intractable conflict. Towards the development of a meta-framework. Part II. Journal of Peace Psychology, 10(3), 197-235. 被引量:1
  • 10Coleman, P. T., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., Vallacher, R., & Nowak, A. (2006). Protracted con?icts as dynamical systems. In The negotiator's ?eldbook (pp. 61-74), edited by A. Schneider and C. Honeyman. Chicago, IL. American Bar Association. 被引量:1

共引文献38

同被引文献21

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部