期刊文献+

动力学与吸引子理论在冲突研究中的应用 被引量:2

The Application of Dynamics and Attractor Theory in Conflict Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 用动力学的观点来看待冲突是近年来关于冲突研究的一个新发展。与传统的研究概念和方法不同的是,动力学的观点将冲突及与冲突相关的过程作为一个复杂系统,冲突各方的思想、情感和行为的相互关系构成了冲突内在的动力学机制。系统内各要素的相互关系可以用吸引子来反映,冲突的发展和结束取决于引发冲突的吸引子的性质。所谓成功的干预则意味着冲突各方形成了新的心理和行为模式和不同于以往的心理和社会环境。 Conflict is a process that begins with an experience of difference of clashing needs or interests that unfolds and changes over time. It can range from extremely negative to extremely positive interactions. Addressing conflict from a dynamic perspective is a breakthrough in research on conflict in recent years. Any conflict can be treated as a dynamic system. A dynamic system is defined as a set of interconnected elements that change and evolve over time. A change in each element depends on the influences from other elements. In terms of a dynamic perspective, conflict is inherently a dynamic process. Unlike the traditional concepts and methods, the dynamic perspective considers conflict and conflict-related processes as a complex system. The relationship among the parties to conflict forms the specific conflict mode, which determines the relationships and behavior rules for all parties in conflict and becomes the origin and internal dynamic of conflict. The key to understanding conflict from the dynamic perspective centers on the notion of attractor. The attractor, in short, is a state or a reliable pattern of changes toward which a dynamic system evolves over time and to which the system returns after it has changed. In psychological terms, the attractor channels mental and behavioral experience into a narrow range of coherent states. The nature of attractors determines the state and evolving tendency of conflict. Therefore, intervening conflicts means to change the inherent dynamic characters of the conflict system, namely the attractor. To change the nature of a conflict system is to establish a new pattern, in which the original attractor has transitioned from negativity to positivity. A change in an attractor can reactivate the conditions that form entirely different model of thought, feeling, and action in relations between the parties. The deconstruction of an attractor for a destructive conflict involves restoring the muhidimensionality of the conflict system, introducing negative feedback loops into t
作者 李小平
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期245-250,共6页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(10YJA840019) 江苏省社会科学基金项目(10SHB003) 南京师范大学留学回国人员科研启动基金的资助
关键词 冲突 动力学 吸引子 冲突的干预 conflict, dynamics, attractor, conflict intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1李小平.群体态度转变的非线性动力学研究方法[J].复杂系统与复杂性科学,2008,5(1):43-48. 被引量:2
  • 2Coleman, P.T. (2006). Conflict, complexity, and change : a meta - framework for addressing protracted, intractable conflicts--III. Jour- nal of Peace and Psychology, 12, 325 - 348. 被引量:1
  • 3Coleman, P. T. , Bui-Wrzosinska, L. , Vallacher, R. , & Nowak, A. (2006). Protracted conflicts as dynamical systems. In The negotia- tor' sfieldbook (pp. 61 - 74), edited by A. Schneider and C. Hon- eyman. Chicago, [L: American Bar Association. 被引量:1
  • 4Coleman, P. T., Vallacher, R. R., Nowak, A. & Bui-Wrzosinska, L. (2007). Intractable conflict as an attractor: A dynamical systems approach to conflict escalation and intractability. American Behavior- al Scientist, 50, 1454 - 1475. 被引量:1
  • 5Coleman, P. T. , Bui- Wrzosinska, L. , Nowak, A. (2008). Toward a dynamical model of power and conflict. Paper presented at the 21st Annual Conference of the International Association of Conflict Man- agement in Chicago, IL, July, 2008. 被引量:1
  • 6Guastello, S. , Koopmans, M. , & Pincus, D. ( Eds. ). (2009). Chaos and complexity in psychology : The theory of nonlinear dynamical sys- tems. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 被引量:1
  • 7Heath, R. A. (2002). Can people predict chaotic sequences? Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 6, 37 -54. 被引量:1
  • 8Johnson, S. L. , & Nowak, A. (2002). Dynamical patterns in bipolar depression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 380 - 387. 被引量:1
  • 9Johnson, D. W. , & Johnson, R. T. (2005). New developments in so- cial interdependence theory. Psychology Monographs, 131, 285 - 358. 被引量:1
  • 10Lim, M. , Metzler, R. , Bar - Yam, Y. (2007). Global pattern forma- tion and ethnic/cuhural violence, Science, 317, 1540 - 1544. 被引量:1

二级参考文献4

  • 1[1]Haken H.Synergetics[M].Berlin:Springer-verlag,1983. 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Weidlich W Sociodynamics:A Systematic Approach Mathematical Modeling in the Social Sciences[M].London:Harwood,2000. 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Helbing D.Quantitative Sociodynamics:Stochastic Methods and Models of Social Interaction Processes[M].Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers,1995.69-102,159-226. 被引量:1
  • 4[4]哈格.定量社会学[M].郭治安等,译.成都:四川人民出版社,1986.72-89. 被引量:1

共引文献1

同被引文献42

  • 1熊光清.当前中国社会风险形成的原因及其基本对策[J].教学与研究,2006(7):17-22. 被引量:26
  • 2李小平.(2005).非线性科学及其在心理学中的应用.南京师范大学学报,2,113-114. 被引量:2
  • 3李小平.(2013b)动力学视角下的冲突解决策略.南京师范大学学报(即将发表). 被引量:1
  • 4Coleman, P. T. (2006).Conflict, Complexity, and Change. A Meta-Framework for addressing protracted intractable conflicts-Ⅲ, Journal ot I Peace Psychology, 12,325-348. 被引量:1
  • 5Coleman, P. T., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., Vallach- er, R.R., & Nowak, A. (2006). Protracted conflicts as dynamical systems. The negotiator' s fieldbook (pp. 61-74), Chicago, IL. American Bar Association. 被引量:1
  • 6Coleman, P. T., Vallacher, R.R., Nowak, A., & Bui-Wrzosinska, L. (2007). Intractable conflict as an attractor. A dynamical systems approach to conflict escalation and intractability. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1454-1475. 被引量:1
  • 7Coleman, P. T., Bartoli, A., Chung, C., Nets, R., & Gelfand, M. (2009). Surveying Attractor Land- scapes for conflice Investigating the relationship be- tween conflict, culture and complexity .Paper presented at the 22nd Annual International Association of Conflict Management Conference in ,Kyoto, Japan, June, 2009. 被引量:1
  • 8Coleman, P. T., VaUacher, R. R., Nowak, A., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., & Bartoli, A. (2010). Navi- gating the landscape of conflict. Applications of dy- namical systems theory to protracted social conflict. Systemic Thinking and Conflict Transformation (pp. 39-56), Berlin, Germany. 被引量:1
  • 9Cross. S. & Rosenthal, R. (1999).Three models of conflict resolution. Effects on intergroup experiencies and attitudes.Journal of Social Issues,55 (3), 561-580. 被引量:1
  • 10Deutsch, M. (2002). Social psychology' s contributions to the study of conflict resolution. Ne- gotiation Journal, 18, 307-320. 被引量:1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部