摘要
作为文学阐释的两种主流形态,反阐释与过度阐释代表着文本意义异化的两种审美走向,从某种意义上说,反阐释是对过度阐释的一种纠偏。无论是反阐释,抑或过度阐释都是对追本溯源的一元论阐释思想的消解,但同时抑制阐释的"泛元化"同样是文学阐释的终极目标,由此为阐释设定边界则成为文本意义延展的重要保证,而建构在文本意图基础上的阐释成为延宕文本意义的科学阐释形态,由此,为阐释设定边界成为可能。
As two mainstream forms of literary interpretation extension, anti -interpretation and excessive interpretation repre-sent two aesthetic trends of the alienation of textual meaning. To some extent, anti - interpretation is a sort of rectification for exces-sive interpretation. However, whether anti - interpretation or excessive interpretation, it is the deconstruetion of monistic interpretation theory. But at the same time, it is also the ultimate goal for literary interpretation to restrain_ ＂Overflowing diversification＂. Therefore, setting a boundary for interpretation becomes an important guarantee to extend textual meaning. While constructing the interpretation on the basis of the textual intention turns to be the most scientific interpretation form to delay the textual meaning, thus making it pos-sible to set a boundary for interpretation.
出处
《北方论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第1期34-39,共6页
The Northern Forum
基金
国家社科基金项目"20世纪比较诗学视域下的中国艺术精神研究"(编号:10BZW015)阶段性成果
关键词
反阐释
过度阐释
意义
文本
审美
Anti - interpretation
Excessive interpretation
Meaning
Text
Aesthetic
