摘要
作为魏晋人著论的新形式,"论难"与"问论"都是反复辩难的文本呈现,不同之处在于,前者引入的是现实中的论争,后者则通过虚拟的问答来展现,前者是清谈在著论领域的延伸,后者则更多是来自佛学界的实践和总结。从本质上来说,二者都基于对话的热情,反映了魏晋思想界崇尚自由、活跃而奔放的时代精神。
As the new forms of writing argumentation by authors in Wei and Jin Dynasties, both Lun Nan and Wen Lun are the text presentations for debating repeatedly. The difference lies only in two aspects. First, the former one uses the practical argumenta- tion, but the latter displays through suppositional questions and answers. In addition, the former one takes Pure Talk extended to argumentations, but the latter has its evidence from the practiec and summary of Buddhism. Both of them are based on enthusias- tic dialogues which reflect the free and active spirit of academic circles in Wei and Jin Dynasties.
出处
《贵州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
2012年第6期124-128,共5页
Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金
河北省社会科学基金项目"魏晋南北朝论说文研究"(项目编号:HB2011QR64)的阶段性成果
关键词
嵇康
论难
问论
清谈
佛学
Ji Kang, Lun Nan, Wen, Lun, Pure Talk, Buddhism
