期刊文献+

气氛强度:理论基础及其研究框架 被引量:4

Climate Strength: Theoretical Foundation and Research Framework
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着多层次理论的发展,气氛强度成为组织管理研究中受到关注的新概念。以多层次理论中的合成模型和文化强度为理论基础,研究者对气氛强度的前因变量及其作用开展了一系列的研究。本文在回顾气氛强度的理论基础和研究框架的基础上,提出未来研究首先应补充气氛强度前因变量的探索;并在不同行业和不同工作类型中去验证气氛强度的作用;最后应关注对气氛的概念界定,从而扩展对气氛强度的研究。 For more than half a century, scholars have sought to understand the antecedents and influences of climates. Climate strength, an emerging concept in climate research, received little empirical exploration and much less validation. Research adopted dichotomous perspective has limited climate strength as a scientific construct. The dichotomous view suggests that dispersion of individual - level perception represents error, rather than theoretically significant phenomenon. Within - unit dispersion of individual - level construets can be theoretically meaningful. During the application of multilevel theory in organizational and management research, climate strength, i.e. , within - unit agreement among unit members' climate perceptions, has received much attention from researchers. Two different literatures in organizational sciences, compositional models and culture strength, were useful as a basis for the development of the concept of climate strength. Based on the existing research, we develop the research framework of climate strength. There are three perspectives to explain the antecedents of climate strength, i.e. , organizational structure, Attraction - Selection - Attrition model, and social interaction approach. According to the organizational structure perspective, organizational forms that are clearly mechanistic or clearly organic have strong climates, with weaker climates emerging for organizations with more ambiguous forms. Research based on ASA model indicated average worksite tenure was positively related to climate strength such that higher average tenure was associated with stronger climates. Empirical research based on social interaction approach illustrated that climate strength is influenced both by leadership style and group social interaction. While concerning the effect of climate strength, studies have yielded contradictory and inconclusive results. In some research, climate strength has been shown to have a moderating effect on the relationship between climate level and organizational out
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期1466-1473,共8页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71073108) 国家自然科学基金项目(71101101)的资助 教育部人文社科规划项目(08JA630054)
关键词 气氛强度 组内一致性 多层次理论 climate strength, within -unit agreement, muhilevel theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献58

  • 1白新文.(2006).两类共享心智模型的发展特征.博士学位论文,中国科学院心理研究所. 被引量:1
  • 2迪尔,肯尼迪.(2008〉.企业文化:企业生活中的礼仪与仪式(李原,孙健敏译).北京:中国人民大学出版社. 被引量:1
  • 3任婧,王二平.互依性与团队协作[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(1):146-153. 被引量:24
  • 4姚琦,乐国安.组织社会化研究的整合:交互作用视角[J].心理科学进展,2008,16(4):590-597. 被引量:24
  • 5于广涛编著..组织行为学 构建未来的工作—生活空间[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2009:354.
  • 6Ashforth, B. E. (1985). Climate formation: issues and extensions. A-cademy of Management Review, J0(4),837 —847. 被引量:1
  • 7Barling, J.,Loughlin, C. , & Kelloway, E. K. (2002). Developmentand test of a model linking safety - specific transformational leader-ship and occupational safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3),488 -496. 被引量:1
  • 8Bass, B. M.,& Avolio, B. J. (1990) . The implications of transaction-al and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organi-zational development. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore(Eds. ),Research in Organizational Change and Development {pp. 被引量:1
  • 9Beus, J. M.,Bergman, M. E. , & Payne, S. C. (2010). The influ-ence of organizational tenure on safety climate strength : a first look.Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(5),1431 - 1437. 被引量:1
  • 10Bliese, P. D.,& Halverson, R. R. (1998). Group consensus and psy-chological well - being : a large field study. Journal of Applied SocialPsychology, 28(7) , 563 -580. 被引量:1

二级参考文献77

  • 1王雁飞,朱瑜.组织社会化理论及其研究评介[J].外国经济与管理,2006,28(5):31-38. 被引量:59
  • 2李强,姚琦,乐国安.新员工组织社会化与入职期望研究[J].南开管理评论,2006,9(3):38-43. 被引量:33
  • 3王庆燕,石金涛.我国企业组织社会化现状的实证研究[J].商业经济与管理,2006(7):30-36. 被引量:3
  • 4王明辉,凌文辁.员工组织社会化研究的概况[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(5):722-728. 被引量:76
  • 5Hertel G, Konradt U, Orlikowski B, Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2004, 13(1): 1-28. 被引量:1
  • 6Alper S, Tjosvold D, Law K S. Interdependence and Controversy in Group Decision Making: Antecedents to Effective Self-Managing Teams, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998, 74(1): 33-52. 被引量:1
  • 7Janssen O, Van De Vliert E, Veenstra C. How Task and Person Conflict Shape the Role of Positive Interdependence in Management Teams. Journal of Management, 1999, 25(2): 117-142. 被引量:1
  • 8Van Der Vegt G, Emans B, Van De Vliert E, Team members' affective responses to patterns of intragroup interdependence and job complexity.Journal of Management, 2000, 26(4): 633-655. 被引量:1
  • 9Van Der Vegt G, Emans B, Van De Vliert E. Patterns of interdependence in work teams: A two-level investigation of the relations with job and team satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 2001, 54(1): 51-69. 被引量:1
  • 10Van Der Vegt G S, Janssen O. Joint Impact of Interdependence and Group Diversity on Innovation. Journal of Management, 2003, 29(5): 729-751. 被引量:1

共引文献46

同被引文献92

引证文献4

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部