摘要
本文针对初级汉语水平学习者,通过半听力与全听力两种测试方式对比实验,发现两种测试方式平均正确率没有显著差异。就测试项目而言,句子理解、简单对话没有显著差异,但较长对话项目平均正确率差异明显。在各测试项目中,句子理解效度较低;全听力测试效度高于半听力测试。全听力测试更贴近听力的本质属性,是更适合初级汉语阶段听力测试的方式。
The traditional way of Chinese as a Second Language listening testing is that the test-taker reads the choices presented in Chinese characters while listening to the contents.This can be called ＂semi-listening testing＂.In this article,we explore a new way of listening testing that we called ＂full-listening testing＂,i.e.,a testing in which the test-takers receive all the information only by way of listening,including contents,questions and choices.We conducted a comparative experiment in these two ways of Chinese listening testing on elementary Chinese learners,and got three main results： 1.In these two ways,the test-takers＇ correct rate haven＇t remarkably difference,but the correct rate of longer dialogue in full-listening testing is remarkably higher than that in semi-listening way;2.The validity of sentence comprehension in full-listening testing is comparatively lower,and it should be replaced by other two or new items;3.The validity of full-listening testing is higher than semi-listening testing.
出处
《语言文字应用》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第3期107-116,共10页
Applied Linguistics
基金
2010年广东省高等学校本科特色专业
2011年广东省高等学校本科重点专业建设点建设经费支持
关键词
半听力测试
全听力测试
初级
效度
semi-listening testing
full-listening testing
elementary Chinese learner
validity
