摘要
这篇元语言学或元语用学论文,通过回顾和评述跨世纪的界面之争,从Gazda的等式,经过Levinson的七种意义,到言说和含义之争,厘清了语义学和语用学界面的经典问题。文章展示了两个学科的经典课题和各自的跨学科全景,理论上归属"互补主义"的"激进语用观"。文章认为,21世纪是意义研究的世纪,作为20世纪末的"显学"的语用学,其微观语用学基于语义学等语言学基础学科将更加深邃,其宏观语用学由于其广泛的应用性、多维性和跨学科性将更加广袤,语用学将更为"显学"。
This metalinguistic or metapragmatic thesis clarifies the classical semantics-pragmatics interface conundrum by retrospection and comment of Gazda＇s equation and Levinson＇s seven types of communicational content/meaning and the disputes over ＇what is said＇ and ＇what is implicated＇. The paper displays a list of classical topics of study in semantics and pragmatics, and a panorama of their respective research interfaces. Thus the paper positions the author on the stand of ＇radical pragmaticism＇ of ＇complementarism＇, maintaining that the twenty-first century is an epoch of meaning studies, and that as ＇pop-discipline＇ of the twentieth century, pragmatics will enjoy greater popularity, because micropragmatics which bases itself on semantics and other basic linguistic subjects will delve deeper, and simultaneously macropragmatics, owing to its applicability, muhidimensionality and interdisciplinarity, will go wider.
出处
《英语研究》
2012年第2期1-15,共15页
English Studies
基金
2012年教育部项目“词汇-构式语用学:语用翻译学的第一座”的一部分(编号待定)
关键词
语义学
语用学
界面
言说
含义
互补主义
激进语用学
semantics
pragmatics
interface
what is said
what is implicated
complementarism
radical pragmaticism
