期刊文献+

试探语义先设和语用先设的特点

A Tentative Study on Characteristics of Semantic and Pragmatic Presuppositions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 先设(又称"预设")是语义和语用两个层面都会涉及到的现象,是语言学研究中的经典问题。从语义学的角度看,先设是句子本身具有的一层意义,是沟通的基础;从语用学的角度看,先设是说话人的先设,与语境有关,是语义先设延展。无论是在语义学或是语用学的领域中,先设及其相关理论都是很重要的内容。此篇文章试图通过对一些幽默笑话及其他语料进行分析,发掘语义先设、在其中发挥的作用,结合相关理论进行分析,并对其特点进行归纳,从而进行一些对比研究。其研究目的在于通过此次探讨明确这两种先设的不同以及联系,对"先设"达到一个更深层次的认识。 @@@@Presupposition is such a phenomenon that both semantics and pragmatics are concerned with. It is the basic informa?tion of communication, and can be treated as a kind of inherent meaning of sentence. In pragmatics, presupposition is highly relat?ed to the speaker and context, is the extension of semantic one. Seeing presupposition is an important part in both semantics and pragmatics, this thesis is aiming at analyzing and comparing these two kinds of presupposition by studying humor stories in order to have a deeper understand of them.
作者 徐威
出处 《海外英语》 2013年第4X期245-247,共3页 Overseas English
关键词 先设 语义学 语用学 幽默笑话 对比 presupposition semantics pragmatics humor story comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1吴平.量化词辖域歧义在Prolog语言中的消歧方案[J].外语与外语教学,2004(12):56-59. 被引量:2
  • 2刘锐..预设的语义和语用分析[D].河南大学,2004:
  • 3方立著..逻辑语义学[M].北京:北京语言文化大学出版社,2000:415.
  • 4蒋严,潘海华著..形式语义学引论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998:561.
  • 5中国逻辑与语言研究会主编..逻辑与语言研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1989:283.
  • 6Kearns Kate.Semantics,2000. 被引量:1
  • 7Gamut,L. T. F. Logic. Language and Meaning, Vol. 1:Introduction to Logic . 1991 被引量:1
  • 8Raskin,Victor.Semantic mechanisms of humor[]..1984 被引量:1
  • 9Skehan Peter.A Cognitive Approach to language Learning[]..1998 被引量:4
  • 10Gibbons John.Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Journal of Women s Health . 2003 被引量:3

二级参考文献25

  • 1黄昌宁,陈群秀.黄昌宁、林杏光教授主持“信息处理用语言理论讲话”第八讲 定子句语法[J].语言文字应用,1996(2):68-72. 被引量:1
  • 2Bridge, D & Harlow, S. (forthcoming)An Introduction to Computational Linguistics[M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 被引量:1
  • 3Chomsky, N. Lectures on Government and Binding [ M ]. Dordrecht:Foris, 1981. 被引量:1
  • 4Cooper, R. Quantification and Syraactic Theory[M]. Dordrecht: Reidel,1983. 被引量:1
  • 5May, R. Logic Form: Its Structure and Derivation [ M]. Cambridge:MIT Press, 1985. 被引量:1
  • 6Pereira, F C N & Shieber, S M. Prolog and Natural Lanaguage Analysis[M]. CSLI Lecture Notes, 10, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1987. 被引量:1
  • 7Pereira, F C N & Pollack, M E. Incremental interpretation [ J ].Artificial Intelligence, 1991 (50) : 37 - 82. 被引量:1
  • 8Pereira, F C N & Warren, D H D. Definite Clause Grammars for Language Analysis - A Survey of the Formalism and a Comparison with Augmented Transition Networks[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1980(13). 被引量:1
  • 9Pollack, M E & Pereira, F C N Pollack, M E. An Integrated Framework for Semantic and Pragmatic Interpretation[ A]. Proceedings of Twenty-sixth ACL[C]. 1988:75 - 86. 被引量:1
  • 10Pollard, C & Sag, I. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar [ M ].Chicago, IL: CSLI, University of Chicago Press, 1994. 被引量:1

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部