期刊文献+

从熵增到非均势:组织冲突的政策意蕴 被引量:2

From Entropy Increase to Non-equivalent Potentials:The Policy Implications of Organizational Conflict
原文传递
导出
摘要 传统组织行为理论认为组织冲突可以通过内部处理、社会规范调节和外部资源介入等方式得以解决,是"均势"条件下的应对策略。由于组织冲突中存在多均衡点、投机倾向以及合谋等问题,利用传统解决机制应对组织冲突问题会导致诸多负面效应,因而需要将非均势条件内化为解决组织冲突的"必备项"。把组织冲突问题从"均势"条件向"非均势"条件延伸,在"非均势"条件存在的情况下,组织冲突双方行为变化呈现非线性机制,在本文所讨论的理论框架中"均势"条件仅仅是一种"极端解"。鉴于此,控制与调节解决组织冲突的政策法律,同样需要扩展到非均势条件下组织冲突领域,并将其纳入到相关解决策略之中。 According to the traditional organization behavior theory,the organizational conflict can be handled by the internal processing of conflict,regulation of social norms and intervention of external resources under the equivalent potentials.As the problems of multi-equilibrium point,speculative tendencies and conspiracy exist in the organizational conflict,the use of traditional conflict resolving dynamics should lead to many organization negative effects.So,the new theoretical vision should take the non-equivalent potentials as the 'must items' of the organizational conflict.This paper attempts to analyze the view of organizational conflict from equivalent potentials to of non-equivalent potentials.Under the non-equivalent potentials,the nonlinear dynamics of both sizes of the organizational conflict are analyzed.In the theoretical framework of the paper,the equivalent potentials is only an 'especial condition'.In view of this,the policy and law of controlling and regulating organizational conflicts need to be extended to non-equivalent potentials and brought into the relevant resolving dynamics.
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期76-81,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 哈尔滨市政府流程再造研究(FZB-HIT2009001) 哈尔滨市政府资助
关键词 组织冲突 非均势 解决机制 行政流程 Organizational Conflict Non-equivalent Potentials Resolving Strategy Administrative Process
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1王琦,杜永怡,席酉民.组织冲突研究回顾与展望[J].预测,2004,23(3):74-80. 被引量:81
  • 2Gert-Jan de Vreede, Daniel T T Van Eijck. Modeling and Simulating Organizational Coordination [J]. Simulation & Gaming, 1998, 29(1): 60--87. 被引量:1
  • 3Hart, Oliver. Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure [M]. London: Oxford University Press, 1995. 被引量:1
  • 4Williamson, Oliver. Transaction-Cost Economics.. The Gov- ernance Of Contractual Relations[J]. Journal Of Law And Economics, 1979, 22(10): 233--261. 被引量:1
  • 5伊里亚·普利高津(Ilya Prigogine).从混沌到有序[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1987. 被引量:1
  • 6张朋柱,方程,万百五.组织内冲突的重复对策模型[J].管理科学学报,2002,5(2):6-13. 被引量:7
  • 7张维迎著..博弈论与信息经济学[M],1996:612.
  • 8岳中刚.信息不对称、食品安全与社会性规制[A].于立.产业组织与政府规制[C].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2006,416-423. 被引量:1
  • 9Korsgaardm A, Jeong S S, Mahony D M, etc. A Multilevel View of Intragroup Conflict [J].Journal of Management, 2008, 34(6) : 1222--1252. 被引量:1
  • 10Mohammed S, Angell L C. Surface- and Deep-level Diver- sity in Workgroups: Examining the Moderating Effects of Team Orientation and Team Procession Relationship Con- fliet[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004, 25 (8), 1015--1039. 被引量:1

二级参考文献54

  • 1蔡建峰.软对策:理论及应用研究[M].西安:西安交通大学管理学院,1997.. 被引量:1
  • 2阿恩特·佐尔格 马尔科姆·沃纳 清华大学经济管理学院编泽.组织行为手册[M].辽宁教育出版社,1999.. 被引量:2
  • 3理查德·L·达夫特 李维安 等译.组织理论与设计精要[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1999.. 被引量:14
  • 4Ferris G R, Kacmar K M. Perceptions of organizational politics[ J ]. Journal of Management, 1992,18: 93-116. 被引量:1
  • 5Kumar P, Ghadially R. Organizational politics and its effects on members of organizations[J]. Human Relations, 1989,42:305-314. 被引量:1
  • 6Vredenburgh D J, Maurer J G. A process framework of organizational politics[J]. Human Relations, 1984,37:47-66. 被引量:1
  • 7Ferris G R, et al.. Perceptions of organizational politics: prediction, stress-related implications and outcomes[J]. Human Relations, 1996,49(2):233-266. 被引量:1
  • 8Drory A, Romm T. The definition of organizational review[J ]. Human Relations, 1990,43:1133-1154. 被引量:1
  • 9Pfeffer J. Managing with power: politics and influence in organizations[M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1992. 被引量:1
  • 10Moroz P, Kleiner B H. Playing hardball in business organizations[J]. IM, 1994, (1-2) :9-11. 被引量:1

共引文献86

同被引文献32

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部