期刊文献+

信任修复:研究现状及挑战 被引量:22

Trust Repair:Present Research and Challenges
下载PDF
导出
摘要 信任被破坏后如何修复是当前信任研究中未解的问题之一。有效的信任修复应关注整个关系,包括信任、消极情感和消极行为三方面的内容;修复结果可能出现矛盾状态,且在某些情况下无法被彻底修复。现有关于信任修复的理论过程主要有归因、社会平衡和结构,其研究视角经历了从单方向交互作用的转换,当前研究更关注修复策略与修复效果之间的调节变量。今后研究应重视归因、人际和结构过程的整合,尝试结合现场跟踪研究和个案研究以提高结果的外部效度,以及考虑时间、社会情景和情绪对信任修复的影响等。 How to repair damaged trust is one of the unsolved and most important problems in the research field of trust. Effective trust repair should address the whole relation, including trust, negative emotions and negative behaviors. Under some circumstances, trust can't be fully restored and ambivalence exits in the outcomes of trust repair. There are three theoretical process of trust repair: attribution, social equilibrium and structure. The approaches in this field have changed from single agent to interactionist, and more and more researchers investigate the moderators among the relationships between repairing tactics and repairing outcomes. Future research should pay attention to the integration of theoretical processes, multi-method validities and the effects of time, social contexts and emotion on trust repair.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期902-909,共8页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(NKZXB10157)
关键词 信任 信任修复 归因 trust trust repair attribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1陈阅,时勘,罗东霞.组织内信任的维持与修复[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(4):664-670. 被引量:37
  • 2Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., Bies, R. J.(2006). Getting even or moving on- Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 653-658. 被引量:1
  • 3Bottom, W. P., Gibson, K., Daniels, S. E., & Murnighan, J. K. (2002). When talk is not cheap: Substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation. Organization Science, 13, 497-513. 被引量:1
  • 4Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A.(2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 909-927. 被引量:1
  • 5De Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T.(2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing work teams- The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring and effort.Academy of Management Journal, 53, 535-549. 被引量:1
  • 6Desmet, P. T. M.(2011). In money we trust- Trust repair and the psychology of financial compensations. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, the Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands. 被引量:1
  • 7Desmet, P. T. M., De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E.(2011a). In money we trust- The use of financial compensations to repair trust in the aftermath of distributive harm. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114, 75-86. 被引量:1
  • 8Desmet, P. T. M., De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E.(2011b). On the psychology of financial compensations to restore fairness transgressions: When intentions determine value. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 105-115. 被引量:1
  • 9Desmet, P. T. M., De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E.(2011c). Trust recovery following voluntary or forced financial compensations in the trust game: The role of trait forgiveness.Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 267-273. 被引量:1
  • 10Dirks, K. T., & De Cremer, D.(2010). The repair of trust: Insights from organizational behavior and social psychology”, In D. De Cremer, R. van Dick, & J. K. Murnighan (Eds.),Social Psychology and Organizations (pp. 211-230), New York: Routledge. 被引量:1

二级参考文献49

  • 1王晓一,李薇,杨美荣.大学生人际信任与自我和谐的相关研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2008,16(6):646-647. 被引量:34
  • 2郑伯.企业组织中上下属的信任关系[J].社会学研究,1999(2):24-39. 被引量:170
  • 3简佳,唐茂芹,彭燕.人际信任与大学生心理健康的关系[J].国际精神病学杂志,2007,34(2):122-125. 被引量:13
  • 4Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2003). Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 295-305. 被引量:1
  • 5Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 653-668. 被引量:1
  • 6Bottom, W. P., Gibson, K., Daniels, S., & Murnighan, J. K. (2002). When talk is not cheap: substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation. Organization Science, 13(5), 497-513. 被引量:1
  • 7Costigan, R. D., Ilter, S. S., & Berman J. J. (1998). A multi-dimensional study of trust in organizations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10(3), 303-317. 被引量:1
  • 8Crant, J. M. & Bateman, T. S. (1993). Assignment of credit and blame for performance outcomes. Academy of management Journal, 36(1), 7-27. 被引量:1
  • 9Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Tan, H. H. (2000).The trusted general manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 563-576. 被引量:1
  • 10Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12, 450-467. 被引量:1

共引文献36

同被引文献382

引证文献22

二级引证文献142

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部