期刊文献+

关系补救:类型、潜在机制与作用模型 被引量:8

Relationship Remedy: Types, Underlying Mechanisms and Models
下载PDF
导出
摘要 关系补救是当一种侵犯行为导致关系中的正面状态消失、负面状态出现时,由一方、双方或第三方做出并使关系恢复到积极状态的一系列行为集合。现有研究主要集中在垂直关系补救与个体-组织关系补救方面。垂直关系补救分为挑战、提供、接受、感激四个阶段,应根据关系违背类型和文化类型权变性地选择补救策略。个体-组织关系补救的潜在机制为信任展示机制和不信任的约束机制,应根据一致性原则,进行系统性与动态性的关系补救。未来的研究可以基于嵌入视角提炼工具变量,并进行跨层次多要素协同整合分析,推进本土化的实证研究。 Relationship remedy occurs when a transgression causes the positive state to disappear and the negative state to arise, then actives by one party, both parties, or the third party return the relationship to a positive state. Previous researches focus on two types of relationship remedy, namely, interactional and individual-organizational remedy. Interactional remedy includes four stages, namely, challenge, offering, acceptance, and thanks. Different remedy strategies should follow the different relationship violation types and culture backgrounds. The underlying mechanisms of individual-organizational remedy are trustworthiness demonstration and distrust regulation. Adhere to the Principle of Congruence, the underlying mechanisms should be systematically and dynamically. Based on the embedded perspective, future studies should refine instrumental variables, make analysis of multi-factors with synergistic and integrated across-level methods, and promote the local empirical researches.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期512-521,共10页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJC630329) 中央高校基本科研业务费重点项目(SWU1409112)资助
关键词 关系补救 类型 原则 潜在机制 模型 relationship remedy types principles underlying mechanisms models
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1程延园,杨柳.组织公平补救问题研究现状及展望[J].中国人力资源开发,2012,29(2):11-15. 被引量:1
  • 2韩平,宁吉.基于两种信任违背类型的信任修复策略研究[J].管理学报,2013,10(3):390-396. 被引量:22
  • 3姚琦,乐国安,赖凯声,张涔,薛婷.信任修复:研究现状及挑战[J].心理科学进展,2012,20(6):902-909. 被引量:22
  • 4Andiappan,M,Trevio,L.K. Beyond righting the wrong:Supervisor-subordinate reconciliation after an injustice[J].Human Relations,2011,(03):359-386. 被引量:1
  • 5Blader,S.L,Tyler,T.R. Testing and extending the group engagement model:Linkages between social identity,procedural justice,economic outcomes,and extra-role behavior[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2009,(02):445-464. 被引量:1
  • 6Bolton,L,Keh,H.T,Alba,J.W. How do price fairness perceptions differ across culture[J].Journal of Marketing Research,2010,(03):564-576. 被引量:1
  • 7Bottom,W.P,Gibson,K,Daniels,S.E,Murnighan,J.K. When talk is not cheap:Substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation[J].Organization Science,2002,(05):497-513. 被引量:1
  • 8Chiaburu,D.S,Marinova,S.V. What determines employees' role perceptions? An instrumentality-based explanation[J].Public Personnel Management,2012,(01):45-46. 被引量:1
  • 9De Cremer,D,Schouten,B.C. When apologies for injustice matter:The role of respect[J].European Psychologist,2008,(04):239-247. 被引量:1
  • 10De Jong,B.A,Elfring,T. How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity,monitoring and effort[J].Academy of Management Journal,2010,(03):535-549. 被引量:1

二级参考文献79

  • 1杨立新,刘宗胜.论抗辩与抗辩权[J].河北法学,2004,22(10):6-12. 被引量:35
  • 2Andiappan, M., & Trevi?o, L. K. Beyond righting the wrong: supervisor-subordinate after an injustice. Human Relations, 2011, 64(3): 359-386. 被引量:1
  • 3Bies, R. J., Shapiro, D. L., & Cumming, L. L. Causal accounts and managing organizational.conflict: is it enough to say it's not my fault? Communication Research, 1988, 15(4): 381-399. 被引量:1
  • 4Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(2): 445-464. 被引量:1
  • 5Brockner, J., DeWitt, R. L., Grover, S., & Reed, T. When it is especially important to explain why factors affecting the relationship between managers' explanations of a layoff and survivors' reactions to the layoff. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1990, 26: 389-407. 被引量:1
  • 6Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. Justice at the millennium: a meta- analytic review of 25 years of organizational research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(3): 425-445. 被引量:1
  • 7Cropanzano, R., Byme, Z., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social. 被引量:1
  • 8De Cremer, D., & Schouten, B. C. When apologies for injustice matter: the role of respect. European Psychologist, 2008, 13(4): 239-247. 被引量:1
  • 9Dirks, K. T., Lewicki, I.. J., & Zaheer, A. Repairingrelationships within and between organizations: building a conceptual foundation. Academy of Management Review, 2009, 34(1): 68-84. 被引量:1
  • 10Dirks, K. T., Kim,P. H., Ferrin, D. L., & Cooper, C. D. Understanding the effects of substantive responses on trust following a transgression. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2011, 114: 87-103. 被引量:1

共引文献37

同被引文献193

引证文献8

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部