期刊文献+

脊髓损伤患者站立活动量与骨密度的变化 被引量:5

Standing time and bone density changes in patients with spinal cord injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:脊髓损伤后的骨质疏松,可造成患者持重能力下降,严重影响其生活质量.目的:分析脊髓损伤后患者的活动情况与骨密度变化的情况.方法:根据脊髓损伤患者每天的站立活动情况,分为3 组:充分活动组每天站立活动1 h 以上;限制活动组每天站立活动不足1 h;无活动组无站立活动.结果与结论:通过双能X 射线骨密度仪对患者腰椎及股骨部进行骨密度检查后显示,充分活动组与限制活动组的腰椎(L2~4)、股骨颈、股骨转子和Ward's 三角区骨密度水平高于无活动组(P 〈 0.05),充分活动组的骨密度水平较限制活动组有显著提高(P 〈 0.05).结果证实,相对于脊髓损伤后的相对制动,适当的站立活动在一定程度上有助于减少患者的骨质丢失,缓解骨质疏松的发展,提高骨密度水平. BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis after spinal cord injury can decline pragmatic ability and seriously influence life quality. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the activities and bone density changes in patients with spinal cord injury. METHODS: Patients with spinal cord injury were divided into three groups according to daily standing time. Patients in sufficient activity group with daily standing time of more than 1 hour, patients in restricted activity group with daily standing time of less than 1 hour, and non-activity group has no standing activities. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry detected bone mineral density in lumbar spine and femur showed that bone densities of lumbar spine (L2-4), femoral neck, femoral intertrochanteric and Ward's triangle in the sufficient activity and restricted activity groups were higher than those of the non-activity group (P 0.05), and bone density in the sufficient activity group was superior to the restricted activity group (P 0.05). The results confirmed that compared with relative restricted activity after spinal cord injury, appropriate standing activities can help to reduce bone loss, alleviate the development of osteoporosis and improve the level of bone density.
出处 《中国组织工程研究》 CAS CSCD 2012年第11期2084-2086,共3页 Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献88

共引文献236

同被引文献72

  • 1叶超群,纪树荣,周军.脊髓损伤继发骨质疏松研究进展[J].中国康复理论与实践,2006,12(1):46-48. 被引量:11
  • 2关晨霞,郭钢花,李哲.治疗性站立及行走对脊髓损伤患者骨密度的影响[J].中国康复医学杂志,2007,22(2):179-180. 被引量:11
  • 3冷燕奎,陈有芬,朱家骏,叶春平,郑艳峰,宋永进,郑文寅,吴华.经椎弓根植骨治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折的对照研究[J].实用骨科杂志,2007,13(12):705-708. 被引量:15
  • 4Ghobrial GM, Maulucci CM, Maltenfort M,et al.Operative and nonoperative adverse events in the management of trau- matic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: a systematic re- view[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2014, 37(1):E8. 被引量:1
  • 5蒋松鹤,詹匡能.胸腰椎撑开外固定器(支具).发明专利号ZL20071013364.6. 被引量:1
  • 6蒋松鹤,舒真谛.快速撑开式胸腰椎支具.发明专利号ZL201320661842.2. 被引量:1
  • 7Lora G, Neil M.Bone loss and muscle atrophy in spinal cord injury: epidemiology, frac~re prediction, and rehabilita- tion strategies[J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2006, 29(5):489-500. 被引量:1
  • 8Wettstein M, Mouhsine E.Operative compared with nonopera- tive treatment of a thoracoltunbar burst fracture without neu- rological deficit[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2004, 86-A(3): 651~652. 被引量:1
  • 9Sharma S, Sin, D, Singh M, et al. Single screw-rod anteri- or instrumentation for thoracolumbar burst fractures with in- complete neurological deficit[J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong),2013, 21(1):71-76. 被引量:1
  • 10Shamji MF, Roffey DM, Young DK, et al. A pilot evalua- tion of the role of bracing in stable thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit[J]. J Spinal DisordTech, 2014, 27(7):370-375. 被引量:1

引证文献5

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部