摘要
针对康菲中国溢油损害赔偿诉讼中法律适用溯及既往的合法性和法律程序进行法理分析,提出并论证对于海洋生态损害赔偿可以在我国《海洋生态损害国家索赔条例》正式实施后溯及既往地适用的合法性。提出对于赔偿范围的确定,可以在即将发布的《海洋生态损害国家索赔条例》中明确规定《海洋溢油生态损害评估技术导则》的法律适用。论证国家海洋局溯及既往地撤销已经发放的渤海石油开发许可的合法性。通过归纳各国法院承认纯经济损失赔偿案例的各种情形,演绎出对传统海事法进行突破从而解开油污损害纯经济损失戈耳迪难结的限定条件,对将康菲中国溢油事件所造成的纯经济损失纳入损害赔偿范围的合法性进行法理分析。
Nomological analysis is produced on the legitimacy and legal procedure of retroactive application of law during the lawsuit of damage compensation of ConocoPhillips China（COPC） oil spill,and the legitimacy of retroactive application of marine ecological damage compensation after the implementation of ＂National Ordinance on Claim for Compensation of Marine Ecological Damage＂ in China is proposed and demonstrated.It is proposed that to define the range of compensation,the legal application of ＂Technical Guideline of Ecological Damage Assessment of Marine Oil Spill＂ can be regulated clearly in the coming ＂National Ordinance on Claim for Compensation of Marine Ecological Damage＂.The legitimacy is demonstrated of retroactively withdrawing the oil development permit already issued in the Bohai Sea by National Ocean Bureau.Through inducing the situations in cases that admit to pure economic loss compensation by courts of different countries,the restricted condition is deduced of solving Gordian Knot of pure economic loss of oil pollution damage by undertaking a breakthrough of traditional admiralty law,and nomological analysis is produced on the legitimacy of taking the pure economic loss of COPC oil spill event into the range of damage compensation.
出处
《沈阳工业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2012年第2期178-184,共7页
Journal of Shenyang University of Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词
康菲中国
海洋溢油
溢油损害
生态损害评估
纯经济损失
戈耳迪难结
拉德布鲁赫公式
罗宾斯规则
明线规则
防洪闸理论
ConocoPhillips China（COPC）
marine oil spill
oil spill damage
ecological damage assessment
pure economic loss
Gordian Knot
Radbruch formula
Robins rules
bright-line rules
flood gate theory
