期刊文献+

美国大学生学习评估工具分析和比较 被引量:17

An Analysis and Comparison of Learning Assessment Instruments Used in US Universities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大学生学习评估是美国高等教育质量保障的重要手段之一。本文分别从评估的主客体、理论基础、具体内容和信效度等角度,对美国当前主流大学生学习评估工具进行了深入的分析和比较。研究发现,在高等教育质量问责的大背景下,美国研究型大学中的一些高等教育研究机构依托其强大的学术研究团队,纷纷参与大学生学习评估工具的研制和实施;纵观这些主流的学习评估工具,不难发现,以学生为主体、促进学生学习是其共同的价值取向,而学生发展理论则为设计这些学习评估工具提供了扎实的理论框架和基础,学生的背景特征、院校组织特征、学生参与经历、学生的发展和收获是这些主流工具频频涉及的内容。我国同行可以从中获取些许借鉴。 In the US,learning assessment is an important way to assure quality in higher education.The present paper compares and analyses several learning assessment instruments widely used in US universities,focusing on questions concerning who is to assess whom,what is to be assessed,as well as the theoretical foundation,validity and reliability of the assessment.It is found that,confronting with increasing demand for higher education accountability,higher education research institutes in many research universities in the US have began to development learning assessment instruments.Those learning assessment instruments share some common features,such as,striving to be student-centered,aiming at facilitating student learning,mainly using student development theory as theoretical framework,and usually focusing on topics such as student background,institutional organization,student engagement,development and achievements,etc.
出处 《现代大学教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期30-35,112,共6页 Modern University Education
基金 国家自然科学基金资助面上项目“我国本科人才培养质量研究”,项目编号:71173022
关键词 质量保障 学习评估 学生参与 学生发展 quality assurance learning assessment student engagement student development
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Richard, J. S. A Brief History of Student Learning Assessment: How We Got Where We Are and a Proposal for Where to Go Next[ EB/OL]. The Association of American Colleges and Universities. ( s. d. ) [ 2011 - 11 - 28 ]. http ://www. aacu. org/publications/AcademyinTransition. cfm. 被引量:1
  • 2Robert, M. G. , et al. College Student Experiences Question-naire Norms for the Fourth Edition [ EB/OL]. Indiana University Bloomington. (2003 - 10 -25 ) [ 2011 - 11 -28 ]. http://cseq, iub. edu/cseq_ norms, elm. 被引量:1
  • 3Douglass, J, , et al. History of UCUES [ EB/OL]. University of California. (2008 - 12 -08) [2011 - 11 -28]. http:// www. university of california, edu/student survey/about/history. html. 被引量:1
  • 4李奇.试析美国本科教育质量评估中的问卷调查[J].比较教育研究,2008,29(3):70-75. 被引量:19
  • 5克里斯汀.仁,李康.学生发展理论在学生事务管理中的应用——美国学生发展理论简介[J].高等教育研究,2008,29(3):19-27. 被引量:93
  • 6Nancy, J. E. , et al. Student development in college : theory, research, and practice [ M ]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1998 : 10. 被引量:1
  • 7Pace,C. R. A Summary of Pace's Career[ EB/OL]. Indiana University. (s. d. ) [2011 - 11 -28]. http-//cseq, iub. edu/condense_ summary, cfm. 被引量:1
  • 8岳小力..基于学生参与经验问卷调查的高等教育评价新途径[D].复旦大学,2009:
  • 9Alexander, W. A. Student Involvement: A DevelopmentalTheory for Higher Education [ J ]. Journal of College Student Development, 1999,40 (5) :527 - 529. 被引量:1
  • 10George, D. K. The National Survey of Student Engagement [ EB/OL]. Indiana University. ( s. d. ) [2011 - 11 - 28 ]. http ://nsse. iub. edu/html/pubs, cfm. 被引量:1

二级参考文献52

  • 1Garland, P. H., & Thomas, W.G.. (1993). New Perspectives for Student Affairs Professionals: Evolving Realities, Responsibilities and Roles. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No.7, 19-20. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development. 被引量:1
  • 2Astin, A. W. (1998). The Changing American College Stu-. dent: Thirty-year trends, 1966-1996. Review of Higher Education, 21, 1150135. 被引量:1
  • 3Council for Higher Education Accreditation (May 2002). Student Learning Outcomes Workshop, THE CHEA CHRONICLE, Vol. 5, No.2. Washington, D.C.: Council for Higher Education Accreditation. 被引量:1
  • 4CHEA Institute for Research and Study of Accreditation and Quality Assurance (Sept. 2003). Statement of Mutual Responsibilities for Student Learning Outcomes: Accreditation, Institutions, and Programs. Washington, D.C: Council for Higher Education Accreditation. 被引量:1
  • 5Marchese, T. (1993). TQM: A Time for Ideas. Change, Vol. 25, 10-13. 被引量:1
  • 6Bennett, D.C. (2001). Assessing Quality in Higher Education. Liberal Education, v.87, n.2. 被引量:1
  • 7Ruben, B.D. (1995).(Ed.). Quality in Higher Education. New Brunswick, U.S.A.: Transaction Publishers. 被引量:1
  • 8Borden, V. M. H. & Owens, J.L.Z. (2001). Measuring Quality: Choosing among Surveys and Other Assessments of College Quality. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education[ EB/OL ]. http://www.airweb.org/images/measurequality.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 9Steiner, L. M. Hassel, B. C. & Tepper, S. J. (2004). Measuring Higher Education: A Compendium of Assessment Instruments for Colleges and Universities. The Teagle Foundation, U.S.A. [EB/OL] http://web.uconn.edu/assessmengdocs/resources/ARTICLES_and_REPORTS/Teagle% 20 Foundation_Measuring%20Higher%20Educa- tion_A% 20Compendium% 20of% 20Assessment% 20In- struments% 20for% 20Colleges% 20and% 20Universities. pdf. 被引量:1
  • 10Swing, R. L. (2003). First-Year Assessment Instrument: A Typology. Policy Center on the First Year of College, U.S.A. 被引量:1

共引文献109

同被引文献188

引证文献17

二级引证文献177

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部